<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>CPA Exam Review Forum &#187; Topic: REG Exam taken - post test downers</title>
		<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers</link>
		<description>Powered by Another71.com</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/rss/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>lucylaw on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers/page/2#post-22314</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lucylaw</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22314@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm with you, TSword7.  I've calmed down some; feeling more &#34;whatever will be, will be&#34; about it now.  Even though I know nothing has been released for us yet, it doesn't stop me from checking the CA site 3 times a day.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks, Dale, for serving as our gleaming beacon of hope and congrats on a 97.  I'm happy to hear the progressiveness of the MC's is potentially a good sign.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If the predictions are close, we should have less than a week to wait for the first score releases!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TSword7 on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers/page/2#post-22192</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TSword7</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22192@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Dale - yes is is my last section.  I really felt like walking out though after the 3 MC testlets.  Of course I talked myself &#34;down off that ledge&#34; and completed the exam.  Felt OK about the SIMS but who knows if all the calcs were correct.  Took me a couple of days to mentally and emotionally recover but I think I'm better now and will wait PATIENTLY for the scores and see if it was truly my last test or not.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Good luck on the FAR when you take it in April!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dale on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-22152</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22152@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Oh wow, and it is your last section?  Take some time to ponder what you've done over the past 8 months and relax.  You know this test likes to play mind games with you.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TSword7 on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-22148</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TSword7</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22148@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Dale - Congrats on that 97 and thanks for your insight.  I was pretty bummed when I came out on Saturday.  I guess we just never know and we'll just have to wait for the scores to come out.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dale on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-22147</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22147@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;If you got hammered on both the 2nd and 3rd testlets that means you did well on the 1st and 2nd for sure.  If you did well on the 2nd then you probably did similar on the 3rd.  If you do good on the MC then you can almost dance your way to a 75 after that.  Hold out hope.  I felt like I got beat up in the REG test and felt like I did crap on the simulations and came out with a 97.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;on a side note, I can't believe this thread I started ages ago is still around.  woot!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>never2late on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-22144</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>never2late</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">22144@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I took REG yesterday (rescheduled after finding out extended test time), and was VERY disappointed about the test i got. I felt very confident going in, as I did pretty well in Becker Final exams which in my last experience (from FAR &#38;amp; BEC) are much more difficult than real tests. However, the test i got yesterday was even more difficult with the exception of 1st testlet. By more difficult, i mean there are 20% of stuff NOT covered in becker book at all. My 2nd simulation has 3 tabs plus written plus research. Becker only has 1 sentence (yes, 1 sentence) referring the first tab, nothing for 2nd tab. And i had to research the 3rd tab to find out what it was asking. So, overall, i am very disappointed. I am keeping all my books as i am totally prepared to retake it in May after my AUD.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;good luck to everyone else. i hope we will find out out score in a couple of weeks, whatever it might be.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dale on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-21578</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21578@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Becker over-prepares you a bit.  If you can get through the Becker homework and final exams you will be well prepared for the actual exam.  Getting the 2nd and 3rd testlets that seem rough is a great sign.  It sounds like you all did well.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>lucylaw on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-21556</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lucylaw</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21556@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I just finished REG on Feb. 25.  I felt (and still sort of feel) obliterated.  I put in about 20 hrs a week through all of January and Feb (40+ hours the 2 weeks prior to sitting) using Becker. Took both practice exams and all sims w/ Becker, but still feel like I did SO poorly.  This was my first section and first sit.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Someone mentioned earlier that the testlets felt progressive in difficulty.  I'll second this.  I felt awesome about my first testlet.  Got up for a drink of water and came back to a mean 2nd MC and a horrific 3rd MC.  I feel ok about my sims although I pushed it a little too close on time for my second.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Good luck to anyone in the same waiting limbo as me and congrats to those who have passed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>konn on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-21328</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>konn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21328@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'll throw my 2 cents in and agree with everyone.  I took REG on the 26th and felt decent about the mcq sections.  But both of my sims were curve balls.  If you take all the Becker notes, homework, and everything else that I had you'd end up with about half a page of information for two sims.  Worse yet, seemed like each tab had a question whose answer fed other questions so I felt like I didn't have a chance.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It sounds like there is at least a chance of passing without doing well on the sims though.  I'm glad that other people have felt this way and still passed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>annlala on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-21289</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>annlala</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">21289@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Oh my....&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I know just this feeling.  I took REG today after a month (approx. 20-25 hours/week) of study.  The MC did progressively get more difficult (as expected).  There were definitely a few curveballs, but I felt they were manageable.  The SIMs though - oh my...they were definitely browbeaters.  I used up every single second of test time (had about 1H20M headed into them).  Was able to complete all aspects of SIM1, all but 2 tabs of SIM2.  By far, this was the least confident I felt leaving the testing center of all exams (FAR passed 79; BEC passed 79; AUD waiting, took Jan 25).  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Here's hoping for a set of 4 79s!  I'll be ecstatic with that result. :)  Now, the waiting game.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dale on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16510</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16510@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;RAO I put in about 30-35 hours per week in January towards REG, so I think we are close in time commitment.  I didn't spike at the end like you did, but I did some self-study time in December (35-40 hours).  The Becker material had more calculations than what I saw on the exam as well.  I felt decent on the MC portions and the Sims were just brutal.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hopeful_cpa on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16489</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hopeful_cpa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16489@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;rao - i took REG on jan 28th and i felt i did solid on the first testlet but then had a killer on testlet 2 and 3 was kinda difficult as well.  the simulations i had were absolutely ridiculous, but the communication portion was fairly easy i thought.  i did all the becker as well numerous times, and i did each final review twice.  for some reason, i dont know if its just me, but i finished all the practice exams with roughly 40 min remaining.  when i took the actual exam i finished with 20 min remaining.  i really feel that my result can go either way, because i dont know how anyone can really know that they walked out of any of these exams feeling like the passed or not.  i guess we'll see this week sometime what the result is.  good luck on your results, i hope this helped.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RAO on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16425</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RAO</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16425@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Lee-IN and other posters,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I took my REG exam today, and I actually felt that the questions were very straight forward, did not have major calculations such as like the ones I studied for in the becker homework. I am very worried  and stress thinking that I did not do well because of that. Did anybody felt that same way after the test and still pass it...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have been preparing for this test since January 3 with 30 hours per week and around 50-60 hours on the last week. I follow the Becker program the way they say to do, I actually did all the MC's twice and all simulations. The simulations I got on the actual exam were pretty straight forward but on the first written communication topic was not very familiar with but I still wrote what I knew. I did not do the research part of either one of the simulation because of the time, I dont know how will affect my score.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Any replies will be appreciated&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WhoDatCpa on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16191</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WhoDatCpa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16191@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Thanks for the encouagement workinghard. Maybe it will work out, just like the Superbowl Saints!! Who Dat! Who Dat!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WorkingHard on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16159</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WorkingHard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16159@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;WhoDatCpa,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Hye i felt the same way last year after i gave my REG ...I used Becker and had thoughts of getting back to studying with REG right after i was done with the exam but i am glad i did not, coz i got an 86 ....so dont worry ...anything can happen...if it makes you feel any better...... i could not even finish the last simulation...i still wonder how i passed ..but maybe at times we think we did bad but then we are wrong ....&#60;br /&#62;
So dont worry enjoy the superbowl...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pearljam10 on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16156</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pearljam10</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16156@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Is this correct?  Some of the sims tabs are not graded?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dale on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16155</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16155@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I had a single topic on 3 MC questions that wasn't even mentioned in Becker.  The sims were goofy, but, in my limited experience, they typically are.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WhoDatCpa on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-16129</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WhoDatCpa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16129@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I got destroyed on REG yesterday. I studied the exact same way for REG as I did the other 3 exams. The MC asked several questions that were not covered in Becker. The SIMS were ridiculous, asking very minute detailed questions. Even my communications were a nightmare. Becker was great for the other 3 exams, but defenitly not good for REG. Pretty Bumbed over this way:(
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TXnewbie on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15984</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TXnewbie</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15984@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Dale, I'm in the same position - just took REG Monday, scheduling BEC for latest possible February timeframe.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have mixed feelings about REG; I could definitely see the testlets getting harder and somewhat 'wordier,' but a lot of questions seemed to encompass rather obscure topics or numbers, not 'meat and potatoes' tax calculations.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The sims were from a different galaxy.  It took me 20 minutes of staring to begin to deduce what the **** it was asking for.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Only word of advice I can give (also referenced above) - don't use the research tab to help complete other tabs in the sim. It was a complete waste of time; I ran out of time by spending too long trying to find the right section to reference in the communication, as opposed to composing a flowing memo that I could've done from scratch.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Time to start hitting BEC tomorrow - 24-25 days from test day!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cmb2009 on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15983</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>cmb2009</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15983@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Lee - You are right...you just never know til you see that slip of paper.  Good luck to you too!  Here's hoping for a 75!!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lee_IN on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15981</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lee_IN</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15981@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;cmb2009 - Like gmb said, you never really know. I kinda feel like I did when I took AUD the first time and failed. I thought I did pretty good but could score anywhere between 60-85. These test are put on a curve and maybe your exam questions were more difficult and worth more points. We will really never know how these exam are graded and frankly I do not really think I want to. All I know is that I need to do better than half the people on average taking the exam and you will pass whether you got 70% or 80% of the questions right. Good Luck cmb2009 on your score as the waiting game begins.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gmb on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15977</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gmb</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15977@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I took REG last testing window and was POSITIVE that I had failed. I felt like I did pretty well on the MCQ's but I completely bombed the simulations. I had an hour and a half to complete the SIMS but did not even come close to finishing the second one. I probably left about 2 or 3 tabs completely blank and wrote a one-liner for the second written communication  As a percentage I would guess that I probably got about 20% correct on the SIMS. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Regardless of what the AICPA says, they grade these tests on some sort of curve. So don't get down on yourselves too quickly, if the majority of others were struggling as well it was probably just a really hard test and it will be taken into consideration during the scoring process.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cmb2009 on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15973</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>cmb2009</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15973@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Well Lee you seem to have done far better than I did!  That is good! I left feeling pretty beaten up...and the more I think about it, the more questions I realize I missed!  I really hope I did enough to pass...I have hope that several people have said they were convinced of failure then they ended up surprised.  I sure hope that applies to incomplete simulations!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lee_IN on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15970</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lee_IN</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15970@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I just got home from taking REG. I am trying to evaluate my perfornance and it is confusing at best. I am not sure if the testlets seem to get harder but I am trying to convince myself that they did. I remember Jeff saying that if they seem wordy, more calculations and more thought that kind of meant they were getting harder. My testlets seem to follow that pattern. The first testlet kinda of flew by in about 25 minutes, 2nd and 3rd testlets in about 30-35 minutes which left with about 1 1/2 hours for the simulations. Felt pretty good at this moment with about 45 minutes for each simulation since many individuals ran out of time for this exam. The first simulation was not something I expected but doable. Written communication and research tab went off pretty good. Each tab was kind of individual so like that. Those simulations where all the tabs are related can be a real bear. Finished first simulation with about 50 minutes left. Second simulation was also doable. Written communications and research tabl was not to bad. Thought I do pretty good on the them in both simulations. The tabs were not overly difficult if you knew what you were doing but did not know everything so made some educated guesses. I finished with about 5-10 minutes left and try to use the research tab to work some of the answers that I was not sure of. For me this was a BIG mistake. First because I was not sure in the first place and the more I thought about the more I second guessed my answers plus I really never found anything that helped.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can see me pass or failing this exam. I would be very surprised if I bombed this exam (Below 65) since I felt very good about the multiple choice questions. Now the waiting game. Hope I will see my score in Wave 1 since if I fail I can start restudying for next window since this is my last exam. One note, I worked every simulation in Becker and I think this helped me, not that the material was the same but to not be overwhelmed with the simulations I did receive. Good Luck to everyone taking REG.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>zena on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15968</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>zena</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15968@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Keep in mind, ZacharyT, that is possible portions of your simulations could be test items, therefore will not count toward your grade. I'm thinking/hoping that some of these really off the wall topics are just things AICPA is trying out. What material did you use? Good luck!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>zacharyT on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15967</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>zacharyT</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15967@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I took Reg on Saturday.  I left feeling crushed, as well.  I think I did really well on the MC questions.  I may have missed a few.  The simulations were absurd.  One tab in my simulation dealt with an IRS issue that was not discussed in my book.  I was completely clueless.  The writing and research were fine, but the other tabs were complex.  I don't think I passed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeffm on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15941</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jeffm</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15941@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Dale...I took Reg last Thurs and know exactly what you are talking about (severe depression and the BEC thing). No idea what I got but just praying a 75 comes across. The good news is there is only 2.5 hours of testing to go and all MC. Keep your head up...who knows, everyone may be right (my wife all of my friends tell me this too); your good enough, your smart enough and doggone it you got higher than a 75!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>strider4216 on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15940</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>strider4216</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15940@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;dude I didn't even read what you wrote except for the first line...I wanted to let you know that's perfectly normal.  Regulation is notorious for making people feel like utter shit after they leave.  I personally thought I failed, was convinced I failed, and I'm not one of those people who always thinks he did bad but ends up doing good.  I legitimately, rationally concluded that I could not possibly have passed.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've seen this same emotion come from nearly EVERYONE who takes reg, it just drains you and makes you feel like you failed, but you should remember the test is curved.  And I got an 85 thinking I failed, so you surely did better too.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dale on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15936</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15936@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm actually looking forward to BEC.  I know everyone dreads the IT questions, but I'm actually a bit of a computer nerd.  I haven't looked at the section that covers the IT stuff, but I don't have any fear of IT like alot do with that material (kindof like alot of people that have a mental block to math).  I read the BEC class 1 material after coming home (I'm insane apparently) and the basics of it were covered in REG.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm going to relax the rest of the evening and hit everything strong tomorrow.  I only have 3.5 weeks until I sit for BEC (then 3 days after that start the FAR classes).  Hopefully I get my scores at the end of Feb for REG, but there is nothing I can do to impact that either way.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bobbins on "REG Exam taken - post test downers"</title>
			<link>http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-taken-post-test-downers#post-15935</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bobbins</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15935@http://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I wouldn't worry so much about Reg, I felt the same as you when I walked out.  I thought I was in the 65-80 range, basically meaning I had no clue if I passed or not but if I did I thought it would be close.  My score came out and I did better than I had on Audit, when I walked out of feeling very confident.  So go figure.  I think your mood going in, the questions you get, and how stressed you are as time winds down all impact your impression of each exam.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As for BEC, I thought it was an easy section in comparison to Audit and Reg.  If you do well with multiple choice and you have some familiarity with the general business and IT topics covered in the section you should be fine.  A lot of people seem to get worried about BEC because it has so many topics.  Just remember they can't test you in great depth on all the topics.  You will simply be tested on a wide range of things.  So &#34;know a little about a lot&#34;.  Just my 2 cents.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

