Okay if the program should not have been tested by the programer then why is that not a violation of segregation of duties?
A user noticed that the accounts receivable update program was not providing a listing of outstanding accounts. The user asked a programmer to modify the program so that the report would be generated with each run and had the request authorized by change management. The programmer obtained a copy of the program and made the required changes. She then tested the program in the test environment and was satisfied that it worked correctly. The programmer returned the program to the system librarian to return it to the production library. Which aspect of this process violated a proper segregation of duties?
A.A user made a suggestion for a program change.
B.The system librarian released a copy of the program to the programmer.
INCORRECT C. The programmer tested the changes in a test environment.
Correct D. The system librarian accepted the program into the production library after it had been tested by the programmer.
Explanation: The system librarian should only accept a modified program that has been properly tested by someone independent of the programmer to make sure that no unauthorized changes have been made.
And they ask me why I drink
BEC 71, 82
AUD 75
REG 75
FAR 61, 69, 83
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2