- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
First of all, I’m glad to be here amongst many other potential CPAs and to share the study experiences.
I am using Gleim to review for BEC. I also work in a public accounting firm, and part of my training has been to learn effective writing. In our communications we strive to keep the subject matter easy to understand and follow. However, when I look at the suggested responses in Gleim the letters are very technical. Of course the responses are encapsulating what’s covered in the study materials, but sometimes they don’t sound like a letter that would be authored in practice. If you’re writing as an expert to someone who has little/no experience in your field of expertise, one of the worst things you could do is overwhelm them with technical jargon. At that point the purpose of the letter is defeated. Thus, my tendency is to cut down details in letters rather than throw them in.
But then, the graders of the exam need to be convinced that you do understand the subject matter, and perhaps the real key to a good grade is to strike the balance I am describing?
How do you strike that balance of writing a true-to-life letter while convincing the grader that you understand the subject matter? What does the grader really care about here? Like I said, what’s prompting this question is the fact that the example letters I see in my software sound very technical compared to what would be effective in practice (though, perhaps someone with more experience than I will disagree).
Thanks!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.