- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Just wanted to see if it is normal to have a different approach for different parts of the exam. FWIW, I am using Becker. For FAR, I did not watch one video. I read the chapter, took notes, did an initial round of the MCQ and then the next day I went through and redid all the ones I missed. For final review I just drilled MCQ over and over.
I tried this technique with REG and realized around R4 that it was just not cutting it. So I have now started to go through all the videos and type notes as Pete and Tim lecture. (This really sucks because I now have two sets of notes on each chapter which = a lot of time wasted). I do feel that the videos are helpful to me in seeing the big picture and for focusing on what Becker thinks is important (of course it’s all a crapshoot anyway).
Has anyone else gone through this? I am super annoyed because I felt like one of the hardest parts about studying for FAR was just figuring out HOW to study. I hoped to just replicate the same method with REG but now I feel like I am reinventing the wheel. Please tell me I am not the only one.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.