[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 25

Viewing 15 replies - 361 through 375 (of 2,797 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #597817
    Tootsie
    Member

    I have a really hard time with depreciation problems. Can someone please explain how to get the answer ($600)? In dummy terms if possible, thanks!

    Mellow Co. depreciated a $12,000 asset over five years, using the straight-line method with no salvage value. At the beginning of the fifth year, it was determined that the asset will last another four years. What amount should Mellow report as depreciation expense for year 5?

    a. $600

    b. $1,500

    c. $900

    d. $2,400

    FAR - 76
    AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
    BEC - 76
    REG - 77

    never, never, never give up

    #597818
    Jspann225
    Member

    @Tootsie

    12000/5 years = 2400 of depreciation per year

    2400 * 4 years = 9600 of accumulated depreciation

    12000 – 9600 = 2400 of the asset has yet to be depreciated

    Company decided the asset will last 4 more years

    2400 / 4 = $600

    remember change in depreciation useful life is a prospective change. So just take the remaining net carrying value of the asset and divide by the new base of 4 years.

    FAR - 93 - 7/1/14
    AUD - 94 - 7/25/14
    REG - 92 - 8/30/14
    BEC - 89 - 10/6/14

    #597819
    Tootsie
    Member

    @Jspann225, thank you! I get it!!

    FAR - 76
    AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
    BEC - 76
    REG - 77

    never, never, never give up

    #597820
    Delta_Diva_
    Member

    I was tested in the past on Variable Interest Entities (VIE). With VIE do you have to own greater than 50% or having an controling interest in another entity?

    Becker or my Ninja notes do not provide enough information on this topic.

    FAR:68,71,70,72 (Rematch 7/2/14)
    AUD:88
    REG:76
    BEC:75

    #597821
    Jspann225
    Member

    @mssolomon

    No, you do not have to own 50%. Under GAAP, you have to have a variable interest in the entity, be able to control the entity, be the primary beneficiary, and have the obligation to absorb returns/losses. It is discussed in F10 in Becker.

    Basically, if a separate company is created for the sole purpose of serving a larger company, the company is considered a VIE.

    FAR - 93 - 7/1/14
    AUD - 94 - 7/25/14
    REG - 92 - 8/30/14
    BEC - 89 - 10/6/14

    #597822
    Delta_Diva_
    Member

    Thank you @Jspann225.

    FAR:68,71,70,72 (Rematch 7/2/14)
    AUD:88
    REG:76
    BEC:75

    #597823
    CPA50
    Participant

    https://ww2.cfo.com/gaap-ifrs/2014/06/former-sec-chair-cox-declares-ifrs-bereft-life/

    “Former SEC Chair Cox Declares IFRS ā€œBereft of Lifeā€

    The former chairman of the SEC declares that full-scale adoption of IFRS in the United States is no longer possible, but his European counterparts disagree…”

    And yet we still have to study it, learn it and be tested on it! Wish they'd make up their minds šŸ™‚

    AUD - 80
    BEC - 77
    FAR - 80
    REG - 80
    3 years

    + 16 tests

    + 2 expired sections

    = DONE FOREVER!

    AUD 88 (expired), 80 retake
    FAR 64,69,67,73,67,73,73,73, August 3
    REG 75 (expired) September 7
    BEC 72, 77

    The adventure continues...

    #597824
    Guti
    Participant

    You can own 10% of a company ,but if you have control, then it is a VIE and you have to consolidate.

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #597825
    kappa1032
    Participant

    I just realized that you can print out the questions/answers on Ninja MCQ. That is awesome!!!

    FAR - 81
    REG - 74, 87
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 88

    Finally.

    ā€œThe only guarantee for failure is to stop tryingā€
    ā€• John C. Maxwell

    #597826
    thwe77
    Member

    Hi, is anyone still using becker 2011 version? I will be taking FAR at end of August and will start studying by end of this month (currently studying REG to take early July). For FAR, I have 2011 version from Becker as well as 2014 Ninja flash cards and 2014 Ninja audio. Is that enough or should I bother to buy new MCQs?

    Thanks a bunch!

    AUD - Passed! Expiring Sept 30, 2014
    BEC - 71, 71, must pass by 3rd Q
    REG - Failed badly first time.., must pass by 3rd Q
    FAR - Aug 31, 2014, must pass by 3rd Q

    #597827
    golfball7773
    Participant

    I would also buy NINJA MCQ. It is 47.00 bucks but if you use coupon code “HIYA” you can get another 15 percent off. It is a great deal šŸ™‚

    AUD - NINJA in Training
    BEC - 86
    FAR - NINJA in Training
    REG - NINJA in Training
    AUD - 71, 73

    BEC - 74, 86

    REG - 77*

    FAR - 57

    *expired

    (I have been trying to become a CPA since 2013). only one test down.......

    FAR: 63, 55, 62
    REG: 65, 77*
    AUD: Fail, 64, 71
    BEC: 72, 74, 81

    *expired

    #597828
    EYNewHire
    Member

    @thwe77 I'm using the most recent version of Becker. In the lectures for FAR he mentions sometimes that rules are different than they used to be but I think those rules are from many years ago. I think it's mostly the same stuff.

    The REG portion may be a little different because some of the dollar amounts have changed.

    #597829
    thwe77
    Member

    Thank you. I do have 2014 on Ninja material, so I am sure that will be useful. Thanks for the info @EYNewHIre. I believe a lot of changes were introduced in 2011 or 2010 on FAR. So, I feel better now to rely on the old material then. I have 2014 REG from Becker.

    AUD - Passed! Expiring Sept 30, 2014
    BEC - 71, 71, must pass by 3rd Q
    REG - Failed badly first time.., must pass by 3rd Q
    FAR - Aug 31, 2014, must pass by 3rd Q

    #597830
    Wanna_B_TXCPA2014
    Participant

    Can anyone help with understanding the logic on a recent Research Sim from the Wiley Test Bank? Specificly can someone translate into “English” what the correct answer is saying?

    The company made open-market purchases of its own common stock with the intent to reissue the shares in the future. It is anticipated that the market price of the stock will be in excess of the purchase price when the stock is reissued. Identify the section of professional standards that provides guidance as to how the company should account for the excess of the market price at the time of reissuance over the purchase price of the common stock.

    My answer:

    505-30-30-2 An allocation of repurchase price to other elements of the repurchase transaction may be required if an entity purchases treasury shares at a stated price significantly in excess of the current market price of the shares. An agreement to repurchase shares from a shareholder may also involve the receipt or payment of consideration in exchange for stated or unstated rights or privileges that shall be identified to properly allocate the repurchase price.

    Correct Answer:

    505-30-30-10 Gains on sales of treasury stock not previously accounted for as constructively retired shall be credited to additional paid-in capital; losses may be charged to additional paid-in capital to the extent that previous net gains from sales or retirements of the same class of stock are included therein, otherwise to retained earnings.

    #597831
    EYNewHire
    Member

    The research sim is asking about the re-issuance of the stock at a later day. The answer you picked was for when the company purchases the stock from the open market.

    The correct answer basically says that gains or losses from the sale of treasury stock (not stock that was previously retired) shall be put into apic and if needed into re.

Viewing 15 replies - 361 through 375 (of 2,797 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.