FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 23

Viewing 15 replies - 331 through 345 (of 851 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #654484
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Leach That's what I thought too. Thanks!

    #654485
    Satchman
    Member

    Just got home after taking the FAR section.

    My take –

    I felt the Multiple Choice Questions were way too easy. The first section i finished in breakneck speed. Took a break.

    Resumed the Second testlet, spent like 8 mins in one question, rest were easy.

    Third Testlet – easy MCQ's almost fell asleep at one point. There were two question where i probably I spent 5 mins each.

    Overall, the MCQ's were fairly easy – there was nothing I had not seen before. I remember guessing only one question and maybe 2 or 3 educated guesses, Rest of the MCQ's I am pretty sure, I nailed it.

    Took another break, and came back – I had 1 hr 20 mins left for the SIMS. Kinda got nervous there. The first SIMS just by the way it looked – I skipped it. Chose the sim that I was most comfortable with and so on. At first glance, I was so heartbroken thought the SIMS were very hard and got nervous. However, I finished all the SIMS did all the journal entries and I am pretty sure I messed up the SIMS big time, because at the pace I was doing it was crazy.

    I had slept only three hours night before the exam, cudn't fall asleep. I felt as if my brain was fried when I got to the sims. Nevertheless, reflecting upon it right now, I think the SIMS were not that hard. It was just that, I was not well rested and looking at the sims my brain prolly short circuited, since they were very long and had some much text – kind of intimidating. In addiiton, I never really practiced any sims. I felt the exam was easy on the whole – not challenging.

    Finally, I would not be surprised if I fail or if i score a 90+.

    Tip – I practiced all the Wiley test bank questions, and I cannot emphasize more what a valuable source it is. WTB is a must.

    Make sure you are well rested !

    Make sure you save enough time for the SIMS. If you have time you shud be able to figure out the sims.

    #654486
    Yaw
    Participant

    The Jackson Foundation, a not-for-profit entity, received contributions in 20X1 as follows:

    Unrestricted cash contributions of $500,000

    Cash contributions of $200,000 to be restricted to acquisition of property

    Jackson's statement of cash flows should include which of the following amounts?

    A.

    Operating Activities: $700,000; Investing Activities: $0; Financing Activities: $0

    B.

    Operating Activities: $500,000; Investing Activities: $200,000; Financing Activities: $0

    C.

    Operating Activities: $500,000; Investing Activities: $0; Financing Activities: $200,000

    D.

    Operating Activities: $0; Investing Activities: $500,000; Financing Activities: $200,000

    The correct answer in ninja MCQ is C and the explanation is below, however, i think it is B because cash paid for acquisitions are classified as investing activities.

    The Statement of Cash Flows prepared by a not-for-profit entity uses the standard FASB categories. Unrestricted contributions are reported as operating activities while contributions restricted for long-term purposes (i.e., plant acquisitions) are reported as financing activities.

    Anyone?

    #654487
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    yawampofoh1, C is correct. fixed asset acquisition is a financing activity.

    #654488
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    On December 30, 20X1, Rafferty Corp. leased equipment under a capital lease. Annual lease payments of $20,000 are due December 31 for 10 years. The equipment's useful life is 10 years, and the interest rate implicit in the lease is 10%. The capital lease obligation was recorded on December 30, 20X1, at $135,000, and the first lease payment was made on that date. What amount should Rafferty include in current liabilities for this capital lease in its December 31, 20X1, balance sheet?

    A. $6,500

    B. $8,500

    C. $11,500

    D. $20,000

    The answer given is B but I don't understand why the interest portion of the lease payment due in the following year would not be considered a current liability as well. All of the $20,000 must be paid in the following year.

    #654489
    excel monkey
    Participant

    Since no time had passed since the last lease payment and the balance sheet date, no interest had accrued. The 11,500 of interest will accrue as year 2 passes.

    Another way to think about it is whats on the balance sheet. At lease inception, you would have made the following journal entry:

    Dr. Leased Equipment 135,000

    Cr. Lease Payable 135,000

    At first payment:

    Dr. Lease Payable 20,000

    Cr. Cash 20,000

    These two journal entries would take us to the balance sheet date. Therefore, on 12/30/20×1, all we have as a liability is our lease payable. There is no interest payable on the B/S to classify as a current/non-current liability.

    FAR - 91
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 86
    REG - 79

    #654490
    Satchman
    Member

    @CTM

    This is good question. I have seen a lot of people encountering the same problem.

    You are right that $20,000 as a whole is a current liability. However, the whole amount of $20,000 is not liable to the leased asset. We have to separate two concepts here – The interest expense here is due to the fact that we are borrowing money. Therefore, the interest is treated as finance expense and not as a liability for the leased asset.

    Along the same lines, if you remember in cash flow statements – when we have a financing activity such as issuing bonds – we don't include the interest paid on the bond as a financing activity but as an operating expense. Remember to separate the two (However, in IFRS you can choose either but you will have to do in a consistent basis). In US GAAP, all interest expense is treated as a finance expense and be treated as a operating expense.

    For the above question – (135,000 – 20,000) = $115,000

    ($115,000 x 10%) = 11,500 = Interest Expense – Current Liabilty due to the finance expense

    20,000 – 11,500 = $8,500 (Reduction in the lease liability – Current Liabilty to the lease liability)

    All the best and wish you good luck

    #654491
    Satchman
    Member

    @excel monkey @CTM

    A current liability is a liability that is due within the next year. It does not have to be accrued first to be a current liability.

    All the best guys

    #654492
    Yaw
    Participant

    @CTM, how would you classify in terms of cash flow, cash paid to acquire PP&E (a fixed asset)?

    #654493
    Satchman
    Member

    @yawampofoh1

    Cash outflow from investing activity

    #654494
    Yaw
    Participant

    @Satchman, that's exactly my point……so what would you have chosen as your best answer for the NFP question i posted earlier?

    #654495
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks excel monkey and Satchman! As for the the treatment of the lease in the statement of cash flows, the key for me is to keep in mind whether I am looking at the lessor or lessee.

    @yawampofoh1, I think the issue in the NFP's case is the fact that it is donated monies and not an actual purchase of fixed assets. Hence the treatment of the donation as a financing cash flow item as apposed to an investing item. The actual purchase of the fixed asset has not yet occurred. The NFP is reporting a donation and not a purchase. That is how I look at it.

    #654496
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    yawampofoh1 – cash used to acquire ppe would be investing. Any gain once sold would be operating.

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654497
    Yaw
    Participant

    Detemined, your explanation is correct so is CTM's. the call of the question in relation to the property acquisition was the contribution made. The purchase of the fixed asset has not occurred yet. if only i could RTFQ!!

    #654498
    John M
    Participant

    Hi everyone! I have passed 2 parts and studied for REG (waiting on the score). However, I am on FAR lecture 2 through Becker and this is definitely the toughest by FAR (no pun intended). Is F2 generally a hard lecture for everyone? Does it get easier throughout FAR lectures or more difficult?

    In serious need of reassurance because I'm losing my mind with this part of the exam.

    Thanks!

    AUD - 79
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    FAR - 77

Viewing 15 replies - 331 through 345 (of 851 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.