FAR Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 25

Viewing 15 replies - 361 through 375 (of 851 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #654514
    Satchman
    Member

    @sundizz

    Yes, you get 2 noteboards and 2 markers in the actual exam.

    The calculator has commas. It also has copy, paste function and tape (where you can see your prev calculations – i really like this feature)

    In addition, It will be great if you take the sample test by the AICPA. IT is exactly what the real exam will look like.

    Good luck !

    #654515
    Satchman
    Member

    @Determined CPA

    The journal entry will help you better

    Cas Dr.

    Loss on Notes Dr.

    Notes Receivable Cr. (face amount)

    Recourse Liability

    The notes receivable discounted account is simply a contra account to remove the notes receivable off the books. Since, we have this Notes Receivable @ face value in our books as an asset and now we are selling it. Therefore, the notes receivable needs to be removed after the discounting transaction

    All the best and good luck

    #654516
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    thank you Satchman! appreciate it!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #654517
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hey Guys!

    Is anyone using the BLITZ for FAR? I purchased the audios and notes..so I'm not sure if it makes sense to also get the BLITZ… let me know..thanks!

    #654518
    Yaw
    Participant

    On January 1 year 1, WSM Co purchased office furniture at a cost of $90,000. Book depreciation was calculated using the double declining balance method over an estimated useful life of 10 years for the first three years after purchase and accumulated depreciation @ dec 31 year 3 was $43,920.

    At the end of year 3, the estimated useful life of the machinery was changed from 10 to 15 years effective Jan 1 year 4 and the depreciation method was changed to S/L method with no salvage value.

    What is the JE to record the depreciation expense for year 4?

    #654519
    rossk
    Member

    Hi, I took the first practice exam from Becker and I got 68% on the Mcqs and average of 72% on the TBS. I am wondering if the Becker exams are harder than the actual test? Any suggestion? Thanks

    #654520
    excel monkey
    Participant

    @Future Ninja

    It is stipulated (indirectly) that they credit sales were collected. They give both a beginning and ending balance for A/R, and specify that no accounts were written off. The calculation for collected credit sales is a follows:

    Beginning A/R………………..$40,000

    Plus: Credit Sales………….$120,000

    Less: Sales Discounts………..$6,000

    Less: Cash Received…………..-?-

    Equals: Ending A/R ………..$30,000

    In this case we received $124,000 in cash from credit sales (40,000+120,000-6,000-30,000=124,000)

    When then add in the $76,000 of cash sales to reach $200,000 of cash basis revenue.

    FAR - 91
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 86
    REG - 79

    #654521
    excel monkey
    Participant

    @yawampofoh1

    The journal entry is:

    dr. Depreciation Expense………………………$3,840

    cr. Accumulated Depreciation……………………….$3,840 (46,080/12)

    FAR - 91
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 86
    REG - 79

    #654522
    Yaw
    Participant

    @ excel monkey, thanks….

    #654523
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @excel monkey thank you. can you help me also on this one? i thought translation gain is included in OCI?

    A company reported the following information for Year 1:

    Net income $34,000

    Owner contribution 9,000

    Deferred gain on an effective cash-

    flow hedge 8,000

    Foreign currency translation gain 2,000

    Prior service cost not recognized in

    net periodic pension cost 5,000

    What is the amount of other comprehensive income for Year 1?

    A. $5,000

    B. $14,000

    C. $15,000

    D. $43,000

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #654524
    AJE
    Participant

    Thanks for the reply Satchman – eases the mind a little to know the test will only test my knowledge and not my patience and ability to use that silly tool.

    I am getting through SIMS on Becker and was wondering how partially right answers are scored? I assume it'll be clear once I take an actual practice exam, but for the sims for each session it just shows you the right answers.

    For example:

    1. Blah blah comment – Expense Immediately as R & D expense

    2. Blah blah comment – Capitalize and include depreciation in R & D expense

    .

    7. Blah…

    There were 7 questions and I clicked on the 7 boxes and chose an answer. I got 6 out of the 7 right. Does it just tally the #'s correct?

    FAR 91 - 04/16
    BEC 87 - 05/15
    REG 77 - 07/27
    AUD 92 - 08/31

    #654525
    excel monkey
    Participant

    @ Future Ninja

    This question was gone over well on page 9 of this thread.

    OCI in this case is $5K, and consists of the effective portion of the hedge ($8K gain), foreign currency translation gain ($2K gain), and pension adjustment for prior service costs ($5K loss). The PSC will is parked in OCI and amortized over time into comprehensive income.

    FAR - 91
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 86
    REG - 79

    #654526
    jinjuujii
    Participant

    A company has a defined benefit pension plan for its employees. On December 31, Year 1, the accumulated benefit obligation is $45,900, the projected benefit obligation is $68,100, and the fair value of the plan assets is $62,000. What amount, if any, related to the defined benefit plan should be recognized in the balance sheet at December 31, Year 1?

    Can anyone tell me what happens to the accumulated benefit obligation? The answer to the current question is a liability of $6100 (FV – projected obligation). Why shouldn't they have accounted for the accumulated benefit obligation into their liability?

    FAR: 2-27-2015

    #654527
    rossk
    Member

    The U.S. GAAP lower of cost or market rule for inventories may be applied to total inventory, to groups of similar items, or to each item. Which application generally results in the lowest inventory amount?

    a. All applications result in the same amount.

    b. Total inventory

    .

    c. Separately to each item.

    d. Groups of similar items.

    #654528
    jstay
    Participant

    C?

Viewing 15 replies - 361 through 375 (of 851 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.