[payaza2000]

Hi so I failed AUD for a second time using Becker & NINJA MCQ. My Becker thing is expiring, and wanted to go in a different direction for AUD. I noticed some redundancy (but not completely) in the questions between Becker & NINJA. Which other review course (with MCQ) would people recommend to supplement the NINJA MCQ. Challenging, easy to understand. I will also be using the Authoritative Literature to study. I am already like two thousand in debt, so it is a sunk cost. So cost at the moment is not a factor.

FAR 5/6/2015- 84
REG 8/3/2015 - 87
AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
BEC 2/26/2016- 80

Thank you God

[Claudia408]

I like how Roger put it all together for me. Hammering MCQs is great and all but piecing it all together is a must, especially for Audit where you need to learn in sequence. I tried Ninja 10 Pt combo for Audit for two attempts and it's a good product but not my learning style.

BEC 65, 71, 75
AUD 62, 70, 78
REG 67, 66, 65, 66, 64
FAR 68, 64, 73

BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8

[Claudia408]

I like how Roger put it all together for me. Hammering MCQs is great and all but piecing it all together is a must, especially for Audit where you need to learn in sequence. I tried Ninja 10 Pt combo for Audit for two attempts and it's a good product but not my learning style.

BEC 65, 71, 75
AUD 62, 70, 78
REG 67, 66, 65, 66, 64
FAR 68, 64, 73

BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8

[Montiel68]

Hello Payaza2000!

I took aud for the first time in August '15 and failed miserably (lower score than yours). I just retook my exam last month and I'm anxiously waiting for my score right now. I'm not an optimist but a realistic person, so I think I'll have to repeat again -.- I don't know what it is with this exam but this one is harder for me than any of the others. If I could, I would repeat Reg or bec in exchange of aud credit. That's how bad I dislike this section.

The first time I took it, I used Becker and I scored weaker in the mcqs and SIMs. For this 2nd time I added ninja mcqs and I think I had a better grip in the mcqs. So, I'm hoping to see an improvement in my mcqs category, but I think the Sims will bring down my score. Those Sims were horrible for me….Anyway, I think I'll add cpaexcel/Wiley for my possible 3rd time. I heard from other ppl in my office that the material is long and dry (compared to Becker) but that did the trick for them. I still have Becker, but I think I'll buy ninja mcq again and use Wiley and see how that goes.

Good luck with the exam, we can't do other thing but keep trying. We've made it this far, so we have what it takes! 🙂

FAR- Passed
AUD- **F,F,F,** Retake TBD
REG- Passed
BEC- Passed

[Montiel68]

Double post

FAR- Passed
AUD- **F,F,F,** Retake TBD
REG- Passed
BEC- Passed

[Vanessachy]

I have Gleim and hate it. Too detailed and no concentration, I wouldn't recommend it.

Far, 64 82
Reg, 60 86
Aud, 74 82
Bec, 70 81
Done done done! I did it!!!
Licensed CPA in MA, issued October 2016

Far 10/26/2015, 64, 1/4/2016, 82
Reg 7/10/2015, 60, 2/27/2016, 86
Aud, 5/9/2016, 74 (ouch), 7/26/2016, I cannot wait to take this test again
Bec, 6/10/2016, 70,9/8 retake

[mtaylo24]

Gleim has the best structure imho…its broken down in 20 subunits with 4-5 topics

CPA (2017)

REG:  75

BEC:  76

FAR:  77

AUD: 78

 

CMA (2019)

P1: 380

P2: 360

AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)

[waffle_house]

Passed BEC with Gleim, but using CPAExcel for AUD. Will be using gleim's huge mcq bank for review (I also like their 20 unit structure).

AUD - 80
BEC - 75
FAR - 84
REG - 76

Exams started Sep 2014 -Exams done Mar 2017

Texas CPA

I put in work, it was evident

[DZagt]

Gleim's structure is awesome but the information overload is real.

AUD - 92
BEC - 90
FAR - 83
REG - 88

DONE!

[Author]

Replies