Involuntary Conversions & Donald Sterling

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #185422
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi All,

    I’m studying for REG and couldn’t help but to notice a real world scenario of involuntary conversion.

    For those of you who don’t know, Donald Sterling, current owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, was caught on tape making racist remarks and the NBA has decided to take punitive measures by fining him $2.5 Million and forcing him to sell the team. The forced sale will likely be at a gain and ultimately my question boils down to ‘is it taxable?’

    I’ve read arguments both for and against and I’m interested in your thoughts.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #551104
    greg422
    Member

    Depends on what his replacement property is. Surely he is not going to purchase another franchise and surely the IRS will audit him. Also depends on how loosely the IRS is willing to go on similar or “like-kind” property.

    REG - 82
    AUD - 97
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 84
    DONE!

    #551107
    greg422
    Member

    Depends on what his replacement property is. Surely he is not going to purchase another franchise and surely the IRS will audit him. Also depends on how loosely the IRS is willing to go on similar or “like-kind” property.

    REG - 82
    AUD - 97
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 84
    DONE!

    #551106
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Could one argue that because they are penalties, the fine is not deductible and the sale is fully taxable? Or is that only true for government imposed fines/penalties?

    #551109
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Could one argue that because they are penalties, the fine is not deductible and the sale is fully taxable? Or is that only true for government imposed fines/penalties?

    #551108
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm pretty sure all fines to athletes/owners are tax deductable since all of it goes to charities. There's a reason Marc Cuban automatically matches any fine the nba gives him.

    #551111
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm pretty sure all fines to athletes/owners are tax deductable since all of it goes to charities. There's a reason Marc Cuban automatically matches any fine the nba gives him.

    #551110
    mjp44
    Member

    Yes. Assuming hes profitable in the sale i dont see a reason why it wouldnt be a taxable capital gain.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #551113
    mjp44
    Member

    Yes. Assuming hes profitable in the sale i dont see a reason why it wouldnt be a taxable capital gain.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #551112
    taxgeek83
    Participant

    If 1033 applies, and, as greg422 said, depending on what he buys with the proceeds from the sale, he may very well be in a position to defer the gain. He could buy another sports franchise – outside of the NBA of course. That would make for some interesting headlines/talking points….

    It would be interesting to see how the IRS looks at it. His being fined/banned/forced to sell (if it comes to that) is really of his own doing. From a purely regulatory standpoint, Sterling broke the rules/rules of etiquette/acceptable behavior/pick one. Would be curious to see if the IRS would make the argument that the facts and circumstances don't support a true involuntary conversion.

    He's definitely going to make money on this though….

    https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/07/us-nba-clippers-value-idUSBREA4614720140507

    #551115
    taxgeek83
    Participant

    If 1033 applies, and, as greg422 said, depending on what he buys with the proceeds from the sale, he may very well be in a position to defer the gain. He could buy another sports franchise – outside of the NBA of course. That would make for some interesting headlines/talking points….

    It would be interesting to see how the IRS looks at it. His being fined/banned/forced to sell (if it comes to that) is really of his own doing. From a purely regulatory standpoint, Sterling broke the rules/rules of etiquette/acceptable behavior/pick one. Would be curious to see if the IRS would make the argument that the facts and circumstances don't support a true involuntary conversion.

    He's definitely going to make money on this though….

    https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/07/us-nba-clippers-value-idUSBREA4614720140507

    #551114
    mla1169
    Participant

    There will be no sale, I almost guarantee it. Wife wants it, last I heard. They'll stall until he dies, will be an estate tax and she'll sell.

    FAR- 77
    AUD -49, 71, 84
    REG -56,75!
    BEC -75

    Massachusetts CPA (non reporting) since 3/12.

    #551117
    mla1169
    Participant

    There will be no sale, I almost guarantee it. Wife wants it, last I heard. They'll stall until he dies, will be an estate tax and she'll sell.

    FAR- 77
    AUD -49, 71, 84
    REG -56,75!
    BEC -75

    Massachusetts CPA (non reporting) since 3/12.

    #551116
    taxgeek83
    Participant

    @mla1169 – I heard that today too. The last headline I saw about it said that she felt she had a right to keep her half – and made it sound like she was ready to duke it out. I don't know much about community property states (I'm not in one), but assuming they're both California residents, would that actually come into play if somehow the NBA could force a sell (there's been some debate on that issue too)? Or are community property laws only applicable in the case of divorce?

    #551119
    taxgeek83
    Participant

    @mla1169 – I heard that today too. The last headline I saw about it said that she felt she had a right to keep her half – and made it sound like she was ready to duke it out. I don't know much about community property states (I'm not in one), but assuming they're both California residents, would that actually come into play if somehow the NBA could force a sell (there's been some debate on that issue too)? Or are community property laws only applicable in the case of divorce?

    #551118
    lleon
    Member

    Doubt NBA eventually forces him to sell, but I imagine the market will force him to eventually. Pulled sponsorships, maybe some hit to ticket sales and also players & coaches not wanting to go there.

    He's definitely bagging a gigantic gain though, bought in at about 12 million, Clippers could sell for 1bn if not more. Milwaukee Bucks just sold for 550mn I think, and they're atrocious, both on the court and in terms of where the franchise is located (not a big city like LA, NY, etc.) No offense to Milwaukee, I'm sure it's a great place 🙂

    Licensed in Arizona

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.