does it drive any one else CRAZY, that when Peter reads out of the book, he just put in his own words instead of reading what the book says? For example, he'll start reading something important form the book, and then mid-sentence he'll just start saying whatever he wants. It totally throws me off and just aggravates the living crap out of me. I can understand if he's trying to make a separate example to help us better understand an issue, but his paraphrasing is just uncalled for.
I dislike his lectures to begin with and this makes it worse, I try not to let it bother me, but it just does. I mean he makes easy things hard because he confuses you with his paraphrasing. Gosh I cant wait until I'm done.
FAR 11/13 - 78, BEC 1/13 - 82, AUD 2/23 - 94, REG is next
