- This topic has 40 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by .
-
Topic
-
Got out of REG today, and I am certain now that the CPA exam really isn’t a test of intelligence or accounting knowledge. It is instead a test of how much you can cram and remember is a short period of time, and also how lucky you get on exam day with the MCQs/SIMs.
I know I am not an Elijah Watts Sells kind of guy, and accounting doesn’t come naturally to me, but these exams are not a measure of how I would practice as a CPA. Note: I am older and am not an accountant. I am looking to change careers or merge the CPA with my IT/business consulting experience.
I feel like I know law/tax at this point, but having taken this exam once again, I don’t feel like I passed. I understand that there has to be some sort of testable measure, but there has to be a better way to test accountants.
Maybe it is a perfectly valid exam, and I am just not cut out….sigh.
AUD - 75
BEC - 75
FAR - 76
REG - 76I want those initials next to my name!!!!FAR - 76
AUD - 75
BEC - 75
REG - 76Now I need some experience!!! And some networking...
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.