Why no include begin direct labor costs?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183491
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Mason Company uses a job-order cost system and applies manufactruing overhead to jobs using a predetermined overhead rate based on direct-labor dollars. The rate for the current year is 200% of direct-labor dollars. This rate was calculated last December and will be used throughout the current year. Mason had one job, No. 150, in process on August 1 with raw materials costs of $2000 and direct-labor costs of $000. During August, raw materials and direct labor added to jobs were as follows:

    No. 150, No. 151, No. 152

    Raw Materials: x 4000 1000

    Direct labor 1500 5000 2500

    Actual manufacturing overhead for the month of August was 20,000. During the month, Mason completed jobs no. 150 and 151. For August, manufacruing overhead was

    A: underapplied by 7000

    B: underapplied by 2000

    C: overappied by 4000

    D; underapplied by 1000

    Answer: B, underapplied by 2000. This answer is correct because predetermined overhead rate is based on 200% of direct-labor dollars. The sum of the direct-labor dollars for the month of August was $9,000. To find manufacturing overhead applied for August, the $9,000 direct-labor dollars is multiplied by 200%, which is $18,000. Therefore, subtracting applied manufacturing overhead from $20,000, actual manufacturing overhead accounts for $2,000 of underapplied manufacturing overhead in the month of August.


    Why no include $3000 direct labor costs on August 1? (direct labor amount in answer only includes 1500 + 5000 + 2500 = 9000) Isn’t August 1 technically a part of August?

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #509720

    it is part of august 1st but its not work done in august 1st. It is a WIP and therefore the labor could of been occured in July, or earlier. As work is performed in July, or January, overhead is applied at that years rate. As work is done in py, it would not have an additional cost associated with it to the new allocation rate.

    ALL 4 parts passed summer 13
    Ethics October 13
    Experience (waiting)

    Becker Only

    #509766

    it is part of august 1st but its not work done in august 1st. It is a WIP and therefore the labor could of been occured in July, or earlier. As work is performed in July, or January, overhead is applied at that years rate. As work is done in py, it would not have an additional cost associated with it to the new allocation rate.

    ALL 4 parts passed summer 13
    Ethics October 13
    Experience (waiting)

    Becker Only

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.