[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 92

Viewing 15 replies - 1,366 through 1,380 (of 2,797 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #598844
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    More reason to hate AICPA. Grrrr

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598845
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ace Corp. entered into a troubled debt restructuring agreement with National Bank. National agreed to accept land with a carrying amount of $75,000 and a fair value of $100,000 in payment and cancellation of a note (from Ace) with a carrying amount of $150,000. Disregarding income taxes, what amount should Ace report as a gain in its income statement?

    A. $0

    B. $25,000

    Correct C. $50,000

    Incorrect D. $75,000

    Why is D wrong?

    #598846
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    I had to add that exact question to my look over before exam notes.

    Settlement of Debt

    -Debtors: If the debt is settled by the exchange of assets, an ordinary gain is recognized for the difference between the CV of the debt and the consideration given to extinguish the debt.

    -If noncash asset is given, a separate G/L is recorded to revalue the noncash asset to FV as the basis.

    -Revalue the noncash asset to FV.

    -Determine the restructuring gain.

    -If stock is issued to settle the liability, record the stock at FV.

    Creditors: Assets received in full settlement are recorded at FV.

    -The excess of receivable over asset FV is an ordinary loss.

    -Subsequently account for the assets as if purchased for cash.

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598847
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I looked it up, the gain on trouble debt restructuring should be the difference between the CV of the payable and FV of the asset transferred to the creditor, so the gain on debt restructuring for Ace would be $50000. But this question doesn't specify the type of gain. The total gain is 75000, isn't it?

    #598848
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    $75,000 makes sense if it says a “separate G/L account is recorded to revalue”…. yeah, where does the extra $25,000 go then?

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598849
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    On January 2, Year 1, Lava, Inc. purchased a patent for a new consumer product for $90,000. At the time of purchase, the patent was valid for 15 years; however, the patent's useful life was estimated to be only 10 years due to the competitive nature of the product. On December 31, Year 4, the product was permanently withdrawn from sale under governmental order because of a potential health hazard in the product. What amount should Lava charge against income during Year 4, assuming amortization is recorded at the end of each year?

    a. $54,000

    b. $63,000

    c. $9,000

    d. $72,000

    Explanation

    Choice “b” is correct. The patent has been permanently impaired and a loss equal to its carrying amount should be recorded. The charge against income is:

    Patent cost $ 90,000

    Pre-Year 4 amortization ($90,000/10) x 3 (27,000)

    Total, 1-1-Year 4 $ 63,000

    The $63,000 would be amortized for another year (Year 4) or $9,000 expense and the balance of $54,000 written off. The total charge to income is $63,000 in Year 4.

    Choice “c” is incorrect. The addition to the $9,000 amortization, a loss for permanent impairment should be recorded.

    Choice “a” is incorrect. In addition to the $54,000 impairment loss, $9,000 of patent amortization would also be charged against income in Year 4.

    Choice “d” is incorrect. Amortization for 3 years should have been recorded, in addition to Year 4.

    I'm confused why the answer isn't A. Can someone explain? Thanks

    #598850
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Esther,

    There is no need to calculate fourth year amortization. They know that the patent is gonna be gone, the product was withdrawn from sale, there is no revenue to match this expense against

    #598851
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Samdiego thank you for the shortcut on the hierarchy, but I do not understand what that stands for.

    #598852
    Melans
    Member

    Were there major changes in the material from the 2013 to 2014 test for FAR?

    AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
    BEC 7/19/13 81
    REG 8/2/14 83
    FAR - Jan 2015

    #598853
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    When Jeff did his updates he said that most of the updates were for REG, not for the other sections. I think you're good to use 2013 material.

    #598854
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    @CPA2014Dream I understandā€¦ Roger makes up random things for his mnemonics. FENCe is easy cus it's an actual wordā€¦ PC is like a ratingā€¦ CUT like a V is just something easy to remember cus it makes no sense šŸ™‚

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598855
    Lidis
    Participant

    Dear NINJAS

    Tomorrow is my big day, my encounter with the beast. Luck to all the Ninjas testing tomorrow and during the weekend

    Lidis

    #598856
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Good luck!!

    #598857
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @samdiego lol but what does it meaaan lol. PC refers to what. What do those letters stand for. And FENCe? You gave me the mnemonics but I don't know how to use it lol

    #598858
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hey all,

    Please help me out.

    E&S Partnership purchased land for $500,000 on May 1, Year 1, paying $100,000 cash and giving a $400,000 note payable to Big State Bank. E&S made three annual payments on the note totaling $179,000, which included interest of $89,000. E&S then defaulted on the note. Title to the land was transferred by E&S to Big State, which canceled the note, releasing the partnership from further liability. At the time of the default, the fair value of the land approximated the note balance. In E&S's Year 4 income statement, the amount of the loss should be:

    Original cost of land:

    $ 100,000 Cash

    Note payable

    400,000

    Total May 1, Year 1 500,000

    Less FMV of land transferred to bank upon default:

    Original note payable $ 400,000

    Less principal payments ($179,000 payments – $89,000 interest)

    (90,000)

    310,000

    Loss on disposal of land

    $ 190,00 is the answer.

    My question is, why isn' the answer $100K? I did carrying amount of payable ($310,000)- FV asset transferred (310,000 FV land + 100,000 cash paid) = 100,000 loss.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,366 through 1,380 (of 2,797 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.