Do you use authoritative literature when doing simulations on exam day?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2212096
    Brokenglass
    Participant

    I have taken 4 exams so far and I never used it or thought about using it except for the research question. I’ve always thought the cost of doing it exceeds the benefit when it comes to time management.

    Does anyone use it and were you able to find the material fast enough?

    AUD 77 (6/2018)

    REG 77 (9/2018)

    FAR 61 (12/2018), 84 (1/2019)

    BEC 88 (2/2019)

    Studying time using Becker (4-6 hours)

    AUD: 16 days

    REG: 13 days (skipped units 7 and 8 and did only flashcards instead)

    FAR: 28 days, 12 days, skipped lectures for both attempts

    BEC 13 days

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #2212558
    Steven K
    Participant

    First and foremost, good luck on BEC today! I take it tomorrow.
    I'm not sure if this reply will be useful to you anymore but here is my insight.
    I personally used the authoritative literature for REG and FAR. I didn't feel the need to use it for AUD and I don't think it would help with BEC. On each of the exams I took, I was able to bang out both MCQ testlets in about 1 hr. thus leaving me about 3 hours to do 8 sims. That comes out to about 22 minutes per SIM. Now, idk how good you are with the research question but I was always good at those and one of the classes in my MAcc program actually had us use the FASB codification regularly so when I took FAR, i literally found the answer in like 16 seconds. As a result I pretty much had 25 minutes per SIM. All in all, i didn't use the authoritative literature for every SIM however, if there was a question that I didn't know or wasn't confident about (ie. in my case it was a SIM on leases), I ended up going into the codification and looking up the accounting for it.

    "If you put in the extra effort at the beginning, the process won't take as long."

    FAR - 81 (11/10/18)
    AUD - 79 (12/8/18)
    REG - 84 (1/22/19)
    BEC - 84 (2/13/2019)

    #2212561
    Mike J
    Participant

    If you have to fill in the blanks for a report during an AUD sim, you might find the authoritative literature very useful.

    AUD - 90
    BEC - 79
    FAR - 77
    REG - 77
    They don't trust JUST ANYBODY to count beans
    #2212645
    Hank Scorpio
    Participant

    I also found it useful for FAR and REG much more than BEC and AUD. I went through the MCQ faster than most so I had the time to wear the IRC out on REG.

    AUD - 71, 79
    BEC - 69, 74, 75
    FAR - 71, 74, 80
    REG - 74, 78

    FAR - 10/3/16
    BEC - 69 - 10/31/16
    AUD - November 2016
    REG - December 2016

    #2212708
    Recked
    Participant

    I found it useful for some exams, but it can also be a detriment.
    Ended up spending more time than I should have trying to confirm an answer on FAR. Ended up running out of time on the exam.
    If you do use the AL, just be careful not to fall down a rabbit hole.
    I ended up not finding a conclusive answer to my question and probably wasted 5-10, (maybe more) minutes.

    Memento Mori - Kingston NY CPA & EA (SUNY Albany 2002)

    FAR-93 11/9/17 (10wks, 250 hrs, Roger 1800+ MCQs, Gleim TB 600+MCQs, SIMs)
    AUD-88 12/7/17 (3 wks, 85 hrs, Roger 1000 MCQs no SIMs hail mary)
    REG-96 1/18/18 (6 wks, 110 hrs, 1400 MCQs, no SIMs)
    BEC-91 2/16/18 (4wks, 90 hrs, 1240 MCQs)

    #2213578
    turo9992000
    Participant

    Yes, everytime, and it is hella useful. I'm good at research, so it was never an issue.

    AUD - 64, 80 Passed on 10/09/17

    BEC - 75 Passed on 12/09/17

    FAR - 69, 71, 73, 83 Passed on 06/10/18

    REG - 81 Passed on 09/10/17

    #2213581
    Kevin
    Participant

    I agree with Recked. It is easy to waste a lot of time reviewing the AL while working on your sims. I used it for REG and it worked great though. If you have plenty of time left and you are working on your last testlet, I would go through and answer as best as you can first and then go back and fine tune them with using the AL. I had about 30 minutes left on REG and AUD and I used that time to research and make sure my answers were as best as possible. On your first and second testlet, I would only budget a certain amount of time. Say leave about 1 hour left or so for the last testlet and that should work. I haven't taken FAR yet.

    REG - 99 (12/05/2018)

    AUD - 85 (02/05/2019)

    BEC - 92 (05/30/2019)

    FAR - 94 (09/05/2019)

    #2998902
    fsugirl2005
    Participant

    Welp, I guess this explains why I kept missing passing scores within a couple of points. I just found out that you can use the authoritative literature on the exams. I thought that was only reserved for the research question. Now I'm really kicking myself because this is something I should have known from day one. I could have been a CPA by now. [insert crying emoji here]

    REG - 78
    FAR - 79
    AUD - 76
    BEC - 75

    I have been on this journey off and on for over 10 years. I think it's about time that I wrap this up.

    AUD - 10/21/16 (75----07/2010 expired)
    FAR - 10/28/16
    BEC - 11/2016
    REG - 01/2017

    Using Gleim CPA Review, Ninja Audio, Ninja Book

    #2999790
    JM03
    Participant

    Like what was said above. I found the AL to be extremely useful for FAR and REG. I found a sim word for word on FAR…

    I only looked at it once on AUD for a quick reference. It was no use at all on BEC.

    Becker only

    FAR (10/19) 80

    REG (11/19) 85

    AUD (12/19) 80

    BEC (1/20) 87

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.