[monikernc]

I have finally obtained the experience for my license and will be submitted my application to Montana via NASBA in the next month or so. I see that KY has the same requirements. Both states allow for a non-supervising CPA to attest to experience. Neither state has a residency requirement. I meet the education in both states. I have passed AICPA ethics. Is there any advantage/downside to submitting applications for an initial license to two states concurrently? Has anyone done this?

AUD - 93
BEC - 82
FAR - 76
REG - 88

How have you been?
Ninja book and MCQs and the forum, all first try! 2016
Licensed State of Montana April Fool’s Day 2020
State of Colorado June 2020 - AICPA Ethics 93
Experience was the worst part of the journey for me. You?
If you want things to change you have to do something different.

FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something different

[vbmer]

The obvious downside is paying two application fees, paying for two sets of transcripts, filling out two sets of forms, etc. The upside? Unless you plan to practice in both states, there is none.

AUD - 79
BEC - 88
FAR - 89
REG - 80

Manager, Big 4 Corporate Finance, CPA (WA)

[AusNat]

What's the upside you're seeing? If you don't plan to practice in both states I can't see a reason to do this. It's extra cost, and if you don't appropriately maintain both licenses (renewing on time, reporting CPE appropriately) you can accrue penalties or get your license suspended/revoked – which you would have to report to any other state you're licensed in.

AUD - 94
BEC - 90
FAR - 95
REG - NINJA in Training

Are we there yet?

Waiting impatiently on my last score.

[Author]

Replies