AUD – Confusing Becker Question HELP

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #822757
    NVP_TheCPA
    Participant

    Management of Edgington Industries plans to disclose an uncertainty as follows:

    The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging infringement of certain patent rights and claiming damages. Discovery proceedings are in progress. The ultimate outcome of the litigation cannot presently be determined. Accordingly, no provision for any liability that may result upon adjudication has been made in the accompanying financial statements.

    The auditor is satisfied that sufficient audit evidence supports management’s assertions about the nature and disclosure of the uncertainty. What type of opinion should the auditor express under these circumstances under U.S. auditing standards?
    a. Unmodified with an emphasis-of-matter paragraph.
    b. “Except for” qualified.
    c. Unmodified without an emphasis-of-matter paragraph.
    d. Disclaimer of opinion.

    Explanation
    Choice “c” is correct. The note presented describes an uncertainty that is properly disclosed. An emphasis-of-matter paragraph is not required in the unmodified opinion under U.S. auditing standards.

    Can someone please explain why?? I chose answer A, b/c in the book it says an emphasis-of-matter paragraph is used when referring to a matter that is appropriately presented or disclosed in the F/S (which is what the explanation says) and is of such importance that it is fundamental to the users’ of the F/S

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #822763
    SkiBum1990
    Participant

    I believe in this question it has to do with what is the BEST answer… like a lot of AUD questions. Yes, the matter is appropriately and adequately disclosed, however, an EOM is NOT REQUIRED for this situation (as opposed to an adequately disclosed significant going-concern issue). –While your answer is not wrong, it is not required, and it not the “best” answer.

    B - 79
    A - 68, 70 (UGH)
    R - Oct
    F - Nov

    "The mind can only absorb as much as the seat can take"

    "The mind can only absorb as much as the seat can take"

    B - 79
    A - 68, __ (got bumped from Aug 4 release to Aug 23-THANKS AICPA)
    R - Oct
    F - Nov (HA! 1 month to study working full-time; love NTS rules)

    #822772
    .
    Participant

    I think because it's not a big deal. It's not like a going concern issue.

    FAR- 88- 6/16- (Ninja Avg. 74%)
    REG- 89- 7/16- (Ninja Avg. 77%)
    AUD- 95- 8/16- (Ninja Avg. 81%)
    BEC- 82- 9/16- (Ninja Avg. 75%)
    [Wiley CPAExcel + Ninja MCQ]

    Finally licensed.

    FAR - June 2016 - 88
    REG - July 2016 - 89
    AUD - Aug 2016 - review phase currently
    BEC - Sep 2016 -

    Wiley CPA Excel & Ninja MCQ

    #825622
    NVP_TheCPA
    Participant

    Thank you for your responses guys. Makes sense now after you both explained it.

    #825646
    SkiBum1990
    Participant

    no problem… /out of curiosity, what was the explanation given for why A was wrong?

    B - 79
    A - 68, 70 (UGH)
    R - Oct
    F - Nov

    "The mind can only absorb as much as the seat can take"

    "The mind can only absorb as much as the seat can take"

    B - 79
    A - 68, __ (got bumped from Aug 4 release to Aug 23-THANKS AICPA)
    R - Oct
    F - Nov (HA! 1 month to study working full-time; love NTS rules)

    #825694
    Trele6
    Participant

    I agree C is appropriate, based on the details of the question this seems like just a normal lawsuit that most companies probably face. It didn't say anything about significantly hurting their business or causing a going concern.. That would be something you want to emphasize in my mind.

    B - 80 Jun16
    A - 74 Aug16, 77 Oct16
    R - 87 Nov15
    F - 79 Apr16
    Ethics - 98 Nov16
    Licensed in New Mexico Dec16

    First go at the CPA! Only using Becker
    Reg / Nov 2015 - 87
    Far / Apr 2016 - 79
    Bec / May 2016 - 80
    Aud / Aug 2016

    #825892
    kayfcpa16
    Participant

    Audit questions are so tricky! Its all in the details.
    Two pieces for important information :
    1. Management intends to disclose the uncertainty
    2. The auditor is satisfied with the evidence and disclose

    Those two indicate that an unmodified opinion without emphasis of matter paragraph would be appropriate.

    If management was not disclose or the auditor was not satisfied then they would want to bring special attention to the matter…

    May the force be with you .

    BEC - 78 (2/16)

    FAR - 78 (2/16)

    AUD - 69 (8/16), 75 (10/16)

    REG - 65 (8/16), 65!! (10/16) - Just Shoot Me [Re - Retake (1/17) 75!] ..

    DONEEEEEEEE

     

    FAR - 2/16 - 78
    BEC - 2/16 - 78
    AUD - 8/16
    REG - 8/16

    #825916
    Lou
    Participant

    This might be one of those cases where the academic answer differs from the real answer also

    AUD - 91
    BEC - 91
    FAR - 94
    REG - 87
    Done!

    FAR- taken 8/11/16....now the wait begins
    AUD- scheduled 9/8/16
    BEC- scheduled 10/9/16
    REG-scheduled 12/10/16

    Live a few years like most people won't, to live the rest of your life like most people can't.

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.