BEC Study Group Q3 2016 - Page 7

Viewing 15 replies - 91 through 105 (of 219 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #785178
    collegecpa
    Participant

    Does anyone have a good way to remember/understand the overhead variances. Becker did a good job with DL/DM variances, but i'm lost on the overhead ones

    FAR (05/23/16) - 75
    AUD(06/09/16) - 77
    REG (07/11/16) - 68
    BEC (07/25/16) -

    #785179
    ImCPA
    Participant

    Hello Everyone- I gave my AUD yesterday and think I might take a few days to come out of the shocker.

    I'm planning to start studying for BEC from July 18, 2016 and schedule my exam for Sept 8, 2016. Does it look like enough time to prepare myself for BEC?

    I'll be using Becker and usually plan one Chapter for each week. I study for an average 5 hours a day.
    With my given dates, I'll have 2 weeks for review. Does this sound doable?!

    FAR - 85 (5/10/2016)
    AUD - 89 (7/12/2016)
    BEC - 9/07/2016
    REG - TBD

    #785180
    mckan514w
    Participant

    @collegecpa am dedicating today to nothing but variances- I feel so lost with the overhead ones- if I come up with any insights I will post.

    @MaLoTu- no real advice except to say hang in there and just keep plugging away at it. I think if it were me I would just start focusing on as many MCQs as possible. It seems to me with your past scores you know what you are doing you are just messing up doing it- if that makes sense… so I would practice doing it all you can. GOOD LUCK– this section truly sucks….

    And they ask me why I drink

    BEC 71, 82
    AUD 75
    REG 75
    FAR 61, 69, 83

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #785181
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @imcpa- that should be a very doable schedule. Stick with it.

    @mckan – thanks, I think you are right… Just have to keep plugging away at it.

    Almost always from my phone... please excuse my typos!

    All 4 passed - 2016

    CA CPA

    #785182
    ImCPA
    Participant

    @MaLoTu: Thank you for the encouragement 🙂

    I shall post more in here once I start studying.

    Good Luck to everyone out there!!!

    FAR - 85 (5/10/2016)
    AUD - 89 (7/12/2016)
    BEC - 9/07/2016
    REG - TBD

    #785183
    klmrr2
    Participant

    Can anybody help explain hedges to me? One day I get them, the next I lose it have to relearn over and over again!!

    #785184
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    klmrr2 – it is easiest to explain anything through an example question. Do you have a question you can share that is giving you a particular problem?

    Almost always from my phone... please excuse my typos!

    All 4 passed - 2016

    CA CPA

    #785185
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Cost accounting makes me want to change my profession to traveling circus clown. I hate clowns. And circuses.

    AUD - 89
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 81
    REG - 81
    I hope my friends remember my name.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #785186
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I got this question right using only an educated guess. (Debt financing's number one advantage is its interest is deductible for tax purposes.)
    Neither did I understand the call of the question nor did I understand the logic of the three incorrect choices.
    Can someone please provide a simpler explanation?
    Thanks.

    CPA-03425
    If Brewer Corporation's bonds are currently yielding 8 percent in the marketplace, why would the firm's cost of debt be lower?

    a.
    There is a mixture of old and new debt.

    b.
    Market interest rates have increased.

    c.
    Additional debt can be issued more cheaply that the original debt.

    d.
    Interest is deductible for tax purposes.

    Explanation

    Choice “d” is correct. Because interest expense is a tax deduction, the cost to Brewer is lower than the market yield rate on debt.

    Choice “b” is incorrect. If market interest rates increase, then Brewer's bonds would have to be offered at a discount to stay competitive with the market. This discount would increase (not lower) Brewer's cost of debt.

    Choice “c” is incorrect. Issuance of cheaper additional debt will lower future cost of debt, but have no impact on current cost of debt.

    Choice “a” is incorrect. Presumably, the 8% yield already includes new and old debt.

    #785187
    mckan514w
    Participant

    @Just3 I just spit coffee out all over my keyboard.

    And they ask me why I drink

    BEC 71, 82
    AUD 75
    REG 75
    FAR 61, 69, 83

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #785188
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Guys I found this slide presentation on slideshare that maybe kinda sorta (am still thinking about it) has me beginning to understand the overhead variances so thought I would share in case it helps someone else. (I never thought I would say this but I miss FAR!)

    And they ask me why I drink

    BEC 71, 82
    AUD 75
    REG 75
    FAR 61, 69, 83

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #785189
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    Good stuff mckan514w! Might have to check it out when I start studying for my retake this weekend. Here's another resource for a lot of the cost accounting topics. Seems they updated the power point and added audio.

    https://highered.mheducation.com/sites/007802563x/student_view0/narrated_powerpoint_slides.html

    EDIT: You can download the power point slides without the audio if you click on the drop down menu on the left.

    "Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity."

    Roger & Ninja

    FAR: 75
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, 73, 82
    REG: 68, 82

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #785190
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    Amor – that relates to WACC … The carrying of debt reduces WACC because there is a tax benefit. I am not there yet on my studies this time around.

    In Becker they calculate it as A = E + D(L) … each one has a percentage per the capital structure.

    I can try to elaborate if you need it … I am actually not sure if I answered your question! lol.

    Almost always from my phone... please excuse my typos!

    All 4 passed - 2016

    CA CPA

    #785191
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I always trip up with bonds. Haha.

    I got market rate, yield, and effective interest rates confused with nominal, coupon, discount, and contractual rates.

    So the yield would have to be used as the basis for WACC?

    #785192
    cpa007
    Participant

    @Amor
    If bond at sell at MR means MR > SR therefore interest expense is more so greater tax saving. Always deduct tax from debt .
    WCC=Debt * Cost of debt*net of tax+ equity * cost of equity.

    Hope and determination will lead to success.
Viewing 15 replies - 91 through 105 (of 219 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.