[rserrao24]

Those who have used only Becker for REG, would you recommend it? I’m trying to decide whether to use Becker (which my firm pays for) or to purchase the Ninja notes/MCQ. While studying for BEC, reading the text and listening to the lectures seemed inefficient. Things didn’t start to click until continuously working through the Ninja MCQ and rewriting the Ninja notes. Thanks in advance!

BEC- 78

[aaronmo]

I only used Becker…so I don't have a comparison point.

I found Becker's course work notably weaker in REG and some of BEC, but that might also be me. Some of the chapter organization wasn't optimal, or intuitive, and the work break up was very uneven. Some sections took me 30 hours, others took 5. That could be, at least partially, me…but I had a sense that others were having the same issue. I felt like certain topics that should have gone together were broken up…especially in their MISC. last chapter.

I passed…despite 4 exam crashes…so I can't complain too much.

AUD - 96
BEC - 84
FAR - 89
REG - 86

Aaron and always remember, YMMV

I profit from your CPE frustration. You're welcome.

[Author]

Replies