Becker's cost accounting section is such a pain in the @$$

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2531085
    Biff Tannen
    Participant

    Currently working out multiple MCQ’s over becker’s projection and forecasting techniques part 2 section (includes breakeven analysis, absorption/variable costing method, margin of safety, etc.). I feel the becker MCQ’s throw a bunch of curveballs (like calculating the answer using algebraic formulas) and require multiple calculations to arrive at the correct answer. Please tell me that the actual BEC exam questions are not this difficult.

    AUD - 78
    BEC - 84
    FAR - 79
    REG - 85
    “An investment in knowledge pays the best dividends” - Benjamin Franklin
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #2533854
    Jimmy Dugan
    Participant

    The becker questions largely consist of retired AICPA questions, so yeah, you will likely see some questions on the exam of that caliber. With the ones you are talking about, thinking algebraically is exactly how to get them right.

    AUD - 95
    BEC - 87
    FAR - 84
    REG - 90
    You're killing me Smalls

     

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.