Cumulative Reviews

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2211502
    Anonn
    Participant

    Hey guys,

    How often did you cumulatively review past material so it’s still fresh in your brain? And what methods worked best for you?

    AUD - NINJA IN TRAINING

    BEC - Test on 3/9/19

    FAR - NINJA IN TRAINING

    REG - NINJA IN TRAINING

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #2211535
    bhunt815
    Participant

    My study method was different than most. I only studied cumulatively. I went through all of the Becker lectures for the entire book for each section before taking any MCQ tests, then did hundreds of MCQ's per week on the entire section. `So, cumulative tests were daily for me.

    AUD - 79
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 84
    REG - 78
    Becker Self Study supplemented with Ninja MCQ's for BEC and REG.

    Licensed CPA in Louisiana.

    FAR 04/11/2016 - 84
    AUD 05/12/2016 - 79
    BEC 07/06/2016 - 81
    REG 08/29/2016

    #2211541
    Recked
    Participant

    I would recommend doing a cumulative quiz once a week as you work through the information.
    I waited until the “final review” phase of FAR and really regretted it as I was on that grind for 10ish weeks and forgot a lot of material from the earlier weeks.
    My final review turned into trying to relearn everything.
    _
    The other 3 exams I was targeting 3-4week study time, so there was no point in cumulative. The whole thing was cumulative.

    Memento Mori - Kingston NY CPA & EA (SUNY Albany 2002)

    FAR-93 11/9/17 (10wks, 250 hrs, Roger 1800+ MCQs, Gleim TB 600+MCQs, SIMs)
    AUD-88 12/7/17 (3 wks, 85 hrs, Roger 1000 MCQs no SIMs hail mary)
    REG-96 1/18/18 (6 wks, 110 hrs, 1400 MCQs, no SIMs)
    BEC-91 2/16/18 (4wks, 90 hrs, 1240 MCQs)

    #2211565
    Anonn
    Participant

    @Recked BEC is my first exam and I’m spending 9.5 weeks on studying, including 18 days of review. Looking at your study timeline, am I spending too much time? (I’m also working FT)

    AUD - NINJA IN TRAINING

    BEC - Test on 3/9/19

    FAR - NINJA IN TRAINING

    REG - NINJA IN TRAINING

    #2211634
    Recked
    Participant

    Every person is different and as you progress through the exams you will learn what works for you and what doesn't.
    I did the whole soup to nuts recommended approach for FAR. By the time I got to REG and BEC I was cramming videos and then hammering MCQs.
    10 weeks with 18 days review is a decent time frame for your first exam, no matter which one it is. You need to learn how to study and what your strengths are.
    No matter if you spend 4 weeks or 14, you still won't feel ready.

    Memento Mori - Kingston NY CPA & EA (SUNY Albany 2002)

    FAR-93 11/9/17 (10wks, 250 hrs, Roger 1800+ MCQs, Gleim TB 600+MCQs, SIMs)
    AUD-88 12/7/17 (3 wks, 85 hrs, Roger 1000 MCQs no SIMs hail mary)
    REG-96 1/18/18 (6 wks, 110 hrs, 1400 MCQs, no SIMs)
    BEC-91 2/16/18 (4wks, 90 hrs, 1240 MCQs)

    #2211649
    Anonn
    Participant

    Lol your last comment in that post just made me feel so much better that I’m not alone.

    AUD - NINJA IN TRAINING

    BEC - Test on 3/9/19

    FAR - NINJA IN TRAINING

    REG - NINJA IN TRAINING

    #2211757
    Michael
    Participant

    I'm taking my first exam tomorrow and the cumulative review is where I definitely feel like I went wrong with this first attempt. With the first couple weeks of study I was good about going back through previous lesson questions to stay on top of it but that didn't last long. Within the last week of me reviewing I have found myself recognizing a lot of topics but not remembering all of the important details.

    AUD - 85
    BEC - 89
    FAR - 81
    REG - 79
    FAR - 70, 70, 81 (09/09/19)

    AUD - 85 (06/09/19)

    REG - 79 (11/12/19)

    BEC - 89 (02/11/20)

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.