[joonpark1212]

I used a different review material for Blaw and ethics, but was wondering if anyone recommends Becker’s for these subjects. Your shared experience would be appreciated!

AUD - 75
BEC - 76
FAR - 78
REG - 79

ALL PASS PLEASE!

[Anonymous]

For the Ethics component, if u like creating a Coloring Book with red underlining/scribbles everywhere go for it. However, the B-Law section has gotten better bc there is less underlining and more teaching by Peter Olinto (finally).

Like I've said before, I wonder if I would have been better off with Ninja or Roger. Becker throws too much information at you, but it is “probably” the most complete package. I would never, ever recommend Becker to anyone who is working full-time and studying. Goodluck getting through all of the material in a timely fashion while working fulltime – yikes.

Anyhow, it's the candidates responsibility to study their butt off and pass – not the review programs job to hold your hand. I guess there are pros and cons with all of them.

Goodluck everyone.

[CPyAyy]

For ethics, yes. For business law, the vast majority of topics on my exam were covered. However, some business law MCQs and one sim were not covered in Becker.

If you use Becker for these chapters, read the chapters and take notes on them. Do NOT view the lectures and underline everything they suggest. You can open the pre-annotated book and copy down any double underlining, anything that says “memorize,” mnemonics, and a few other topics but don't go underlining crazy. It's a waste of time and ineffective.

REG: Q3 '17

FAR: Q4 '17

AUD: Q4 '17

BEC: Q1 '18

[joonpark1212]

Thanks for providing your inputs. I glimpsed over the lectures and it seems to be nice, although i don't have the becker books to underline…. so i take photos with my phone after every chapter.

AUD - 75
BEC - 76
FAR - 78
REG - 79

ALL PASS PLEASE!

[Author]

Replies