Failed REG – should I study for REG again with TCJA or move on to FAR?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2108931
    Scoobert
    Participant

    For those of us who studied for REG and failed, what do you recommend pushing forward with REG or moving onto a different section? I guess I am worried that the two different tax laws will get confusing to me since I just studied one and now have to learn the other.

    Also, what are your study schedules?

    Any advice at all, related to this or not, is greatly appreciated.

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #2108967
    rahee
    Participant

    I have the same question. not sure if i should retake in jan or focus on far first…

    AUD - 84
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 82
    REG - 79
    Rahee
    #2109516
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Retake 100%. I had to retake AUD and REG, and both times studying the second time I felt more confident and took less time because I had the gist of what the exam was looking for. I also recommend going over to the AICPA blueprints now that you have seen the exam. Goodluck to you both!

    FAR: 78*, 75
    REG: 76*, 85
    BEC: 79*, 76
    AUD: 79*, 93

    All scores expired, let's try this again.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #2109927
    Soup
    Participant

    Im on the same boat, I got a 67 but not sure if I should move on. I scheduled BEC at the end of January. Should I focus on BEC or just go back to REG

    AUD - NINJA in Training
    BEC - NINJA in Training
    FAR - NINJA in Training
    REG - NINJA in Training
    Good Luck!
    #2113503
    Maverick
    Participant

    What study materials did you use? I just passed REG with an 88 using only Becker. Becker had amazing MC practice questions and the sims were good enough. I cannot recommend Becker enough.

    Also, I would retake. You shouldn't need to work too hard just brush up on your weak areas. But whatever you do be confident and do not quit trying. Good luck and keep grinding.

    AUD - 87
    BEC - 78
    FAR - 83
    REG - 88
    Studying with Becker.
    #2113614
    ems215
    Participant

    the issue is that REG changes, but are the changes substantial? I am not confident in passing

    #2113623
    jeff
    Keymaster

    There are a lot of changes – it's mostly “this isn't deductible anymore” type of stuff.

    NINJA Notes cover it pretty well in my biased opinion. 🙂

    AUD - 79
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 76
    REG - 92
    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS)
    NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE | Another71
    #2113632
    jeff
    Keymaster

    …and I wouldn't shy away from a retake…yes, there are a lot of changes, but it's still tax law – between the notes and the audio plus whatever else you're using, you'll be fine.

    AUD - 79
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 76
    REG - 92
    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS)
    NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE | Another71
    #2113647
    ems215
    Participant

    i just ordered the new becker book in case I failed, hopefully I won't have to use it

    #2113695
    ems215
    Participant

    thanks jeff, REG is my last one anyway so no choice

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.