- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 6 years, 7 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
In the last sim, #5, the answers seem pretty straightforward to me except for the last one.
Deals with warrants outstanding being exercised and the effect on diluted EPS….anybody know why the correct answer is to delete the sentence?
Seems to me that since it isn’t anti-dilutive, that info should be included.
But then again, wtf do I know?
BEC - 79 (5/13/16)REG - 76 (7/1/17)
FAR - 89 (9/9/17), Â (73 on 3/7/17)
AUD - 80 (11/20/17), Â (73 on 5/8/17)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.