[Frances]

For people who have sat FAR recently, is the retail inventory method tested? Becker did not cover it and I have forgotten how to do it.

AUD - NINJA in Training
BEC - NINJA in Training
FAR - NINJA in Training
REG - NINJA in Training

Waiting for NASBA to process my application.

[turo9992000]

It could be tested. Becker does have some MCQs on it. I would get those wrong in the review phase, and when I saw the required calculations required, I figured that it was not worth it to really learn it. The review courses do not cover everything in their lectures. They only cover what they think is most likely to be on the exam. That's why most people say to hammer MCQs non stop.

AUD - 64, 80 Passed on 10/09/17

BEC - 75 Passed on 12/09/17

FAR - 69, 71, 73, 83 Passed on 06/10/18

REG - 81 Passed on 09/10/17

[alloverit]

We're not allowed to disclose that. As Turo9992000 wrote, it could be tested.

FAR in particular is an inch deep and a mile wide! No one could even begin to predict which of the more lightly covered items might pop up.

FAR 81

AUD 83

BEC 93

REG 84

Ross

[iwantthiscpa]

Based on how much it's covered in my study material, it's not that important of a topic. I wouldn't spend that much time on it.

FAR: 67, 69, 74, 81
AUD: 72, 74, 78
REG: 77
BEC: 70, 77

[Anonymous]

roger covers it. whoever came up with that should be throat punched. I am familiar with it on a high level but not spending time diving into it

[Author]

Replies