NINJA MCQ Pass Accuracy went UP after the 2017 CPA Exam "Change"

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1642651
    Holly
    Participant

    I believe it! I actually prefer the new format. I took two with old and two with new

    AUD - 76
    BEC - 82
    FAR - 82
    REG - 86
    Becker & Ninja MCQ

     

     

     

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1642663
    Lentilcounter
    Participant

    Interesting data. I think the new format works for audit and my opinion is based on taking both the old and the new format. For FAR, I would like to see the DRS simulations improved so that the computer's screen maximum viewing capability is utilized. I understand that they are fixing this for 2018 but that's not soon enough for those of us, who are taking it in the next few months.

    For those who thought they were going to pass based on Ninja MCQ scores and didn't, what do you think went wrong? What is it your first attempt at the exam?

    BEC = 79

    AUD = 79

    FAR = 84

    REG = 86

    Prayer + AICPA blueprints = my success

    BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
    FAR = ?
    REG = ?
    AUD = ?

    #1642946

    Recently passed AUD (2017 Q3). Used my 2016 Ninja notes as part of my reading/review. Hardly done any MCQs/SIMs, just reading 2016 Ninja notes/older Becker 2008 textbook.

    I will definitely have a more concrete report about Ninja products by the end of 2017, especially score results. Taking 3 sections this 2017 Q4, using mostly Ninja products (FAR/BEC/REG Sniper packages).

    AUD - 49
    BEC - NINJA in Training
    FAR - NINJA in Training
    REG - 55
    Passed: AUD (75%'08/77%'17), REG (76%'09) & BLaw(77%'99); highest on FAR (63%'11/'15) & BEC (63%'11). Credit Hours: USA(PH)-BCom'85(4yr-grandfathered); UBC-(DAP'02/'19); DC-(BBA-Acctg.'22-4th yr)=over 150 hrs credits
Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.