- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 6 years, 11 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hey community, so I’m having some issues with the authoritative literature in audit – I have both Becker and Rogers. I’ve finished all of the mcqs and sims for both Becker and Rogers, plus the research questions for Becker. I tried working through the research questions for Rogers but the answers for them are not even close to what I’m finding in the authoritative literature! I’m not sure if it’s something I’m doing or if Rogers hasn’t ‘updated’ their research answers because some of them aren’t even in the AL! I’m getting paranoid that I’m doing something wrong but I feel like this is on Roger’s end. Anybody else have a similar issue? I did not struggle nearly as bad with Becker’s research questions – got almost all of them correct or at a minimum was at least in the correct subscript. I’m probably not even going to worry about it because I understand how to navigate the material and you use the search functions with keywords, but it like totally threw me off that I could hardly generate an even remotely correct answer with Roger’s research questions. Please let me know if you’ve had trouble with the audit research questions with Rogers.
REG - 92 (1/17)BEC - 82 (2/17)
AUD - 89 (5/17)
FAR - 94 (9/17)
Rogers Elite + Becker mcqs/sims for all 4 exams
WA State Ethics Exam - 83, 83, 90 (9/17)
AICPA Ethics Exam - 95 (9/17)
1-year of work - complete (11/18)
Licensed WA State CPA
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.