Taking a CPA exam when not ready just to see what it's like

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1651850
    bronze5988
    Participant

    Has anyone taken an exam feeling only 5o % ready just because you want to see what the exam is like and then know how to study for it better the second time around?
    Did you consider this to be helpful or more like a waste of time/money?

Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1651862
    PNS2CLT
    Participant

    It's a total waste of time and money. The AICPA offers sample tests and the lion's share of questions within respective review program (Ninja, Becker, etc.) are AICPA-released questions. Put simply… you don't need to take the exam to know what it's going to be like. Also note that each exam experience is unique — your live “practice” BEC exam could be heavy on variance analysis but your “actual” exam may not ever address it.

    #1651865
    Ana
    Participant

    I do think it's helpful if you can afford it and your clock isn't ticking. However, I wouldn't take an exam without having reviewed the material at all bc then it'll look completely foreign and you won't be able to compare it to the study mcq.

    BEC - 78
    AUD - 75
    REG - 64, 77
    FAR - 73, 73, 73, 82
    Ethics: 74, 84, 98
    Finally done after 23 months.
    #1651871
    M123
    Participant

    100% agree – no way. It's cruel and unusual self-punishment.

    First exam I had no idea what to expect as I had done several certs before. Thought this would be “on par”. No.

    If you expect the time limit to be demanding, expect it to be harder than most college exams (ALL in my case), and practice with those thing in mind with either MCQ sessions or mock exams – you will get the feel in a “safe” way.

    AUD - 77
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 77
    REG - 81
    REG - 1. Becker only - fail (forgot to study depr - oops); 2. Becker only - Pass
    FAR - 1. Becker only - fail; 2. added Ninja Notes and MCQ - Pass
    AUD - 1. Becker videos; Ninja Notes, Audio, MCQ, Becker Notes - Pass
    BEC - 1. Ninja Notes, Audio, MCQ, Becker Notes - Pass
    #1651885
    Missy
    Participant

    I can guarantee you that what you see the second time will be nothing like the first time.

    Old timer,  A71'er since 2010.

    Finance manager/HR manager

     

     

    Licensed Massachusetts Non Reporting CPA since 2012
    Finance/Admin/HR Manager

    #1651909
    shawn in VA
    Participant

    Missy-

    I don't know about that. I had to take BEC more that once and I got some recycled questions. Meaning they were IDENTICAL to the ones I got in my prior exam. Not many, I would say no more than 3 MCQs.

    AUD - 84
    BEC - 81
    FAR - NINJA in Training
    REG - 75
    AUD - 84

    BEC-  81

    REG-75

    FAR- TBD

    #1651924
    jenpen
    Participant

    If you've attempted to study for it and the NTS is getting ready to expire, then go for it. If you can push it out until you've had time to properly study and review, then definitely do that. Like ours have said, it would be a waste of time and money if you pay for an NTS just to try it. You can take the sample exam on the AICPA website and get that for free. But if you're gonna lose the money anyway, then meh, go ahead and take it.

    AUD - 85
    BEC - 84
    FAR - 82
    REG - 78
    Ethics - 95
    Licensed in IL & MO

    AUD - 56 - 68 - 61 - 9/8/16
    REG - 75
    FAR - 7/15/16
    BEC - TBD

    Wiley CPAexcel and NINJA 10 Point Combo

    #1651933
    Missy
    Participant

    Yeah there will be recycled questions but they're hardly the bulk of the exam and you'll never know if they're weighted the same in different quarters. May have been pre-test questions the first time and very low point value the second time.

    Old timer,  A71'er since 2010.

    Finance manager/HR manager

     

     

    Licensed Massachusetts Non Reporting CPA since 2012
    Finance/Admin/HR Manager

    #1651934
    PNS2CLT
    Participant

    shawn in VA,
    I'm sure a few questions make an appearance across multiple testlets but as a generalization her statement is true. Also keep in mind that even though a question might be replicated, its answer choices might not be. For example, if 40% of test takers select “B” and 40%, “D”, the question may be in a difficult testlet — but if answer choice “D” is removed and 70% answer “B”, it might be in a medium difficultly testlet.

    #1652104
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I wouldn't necessarily go into an exam with the expectation of having to take it again. But if your NTS was expiring or you want to squeeze it in at the end of the quarter, then I'd say go for it. Every exam is a learning experience, even if your questions are different the next time.

    #1652114
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That's a waste of $345 dollars…I think that if you are up against the clock and reasonably prepared, then maybe….But to do it having not really studied? That's a no go for me.

    #1652224
    Tim
    Participant

    Seems like a complete waste of time and money. You won't even get feedback about which ones you got right or wrong. You're way better off just doing practice tests in whatever review material you have and doing the AICPA sample test. The exam really shouldn't be a big surprise. There's ample resources to get a good idea of what it will be like without actually taking it.


    FAR - 97 (10/12/17)
    BEC - 95 (01/15/18)
    AUD - 88 (04/06/18)
    REG - 89 (11/16/18)
    #1652482
    CPA2BEE
    Participant

    Awful idea. Waste of time and money, and probably will kill your confidence because you will think it is more daunting than it really is if you don't know anything. You can see if you are prepared based off of your study materials and AICPA practice exams – the real exams are not far off from those materials.

    CA CPA - est. Dec 2016

    FAR - 80
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 80
    REG - 85

    ETHICS - 90
    EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
    Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

    #1652573
    cpApex Predator
    Participant

    For selfish reasons, yes it is a very good idea. The lower the overall average score, the heavier the weighting. I think a whole bunch of people should just try it out without studying.

    AUD - NINJA in Training
    BEC - NINJA in Training
    FAR - 86
    REG - 89
    Why do you lag?  What is it to you that idle tongues will wag?  Follow my steps through all such whisper of you.  Be as a tower of stone, unswayed by whatever the winds may do.  For when a man lets his attention stray, it saps his mind's force with continual change.  -Dante
Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.