[Jj]

I used Becker for FAR, AUD, and BEC. It was good for some sections, terrible for others. What is everyone’s opinion on the best REG program?

[M123]

I used all Becker for REG, before I knew about Ninja. I think if you combined REG with Ninja MCQ and Notes you'll have a combination that would be hard to surpass.

AUD - 77
BEC - 81
FAR - 77
REG - 81

REG - 1. Becker only - fail (forgot to study depr - oops); 2. Becker only - Pass
FAR - 1. Becker only - fail; 2. added Ninja Notes and MCQ - Pass
AUD - 1. Becker videos; Ninja Notes, Audio, MCQ, Becker Notes - Pass
BEC - 1. Ninja Notes, Audio, MCQ, Becker Notes - Pass

[bhunt815]

I used Becker and Ninja for REG and passed, just barely but I passed. My test, especially the SIM's, seemed to concentrate on areas that I assumed wouldn't be heavily tested while I was studying. Like really obscure areas of the Becker book. I was fortunate to pass at all.

AUD - 79
BEC - 81
FAR - 84
REG - 78

Becker Self Study supplemented with Ninja MCQ's for BEC and REG.

Licensed CPA in Louisiana.

FAR 04/11/2016 - 84
AUD 05/12/2016 - 79
BEC 07/06/2016 - 81
REG 08/29/2016

[kdawg22]

I used wiley and NINJA MCQ and it seemed to be more than enough

Trust the Process

FAR - 83 Wiley
BEC - 68 Wiley, 74 (Wiley & NINJA), 79 (Wiley, NINJA, & Becker SIMS)
AUD - 72 Wiley, 77 (Wiley & NINJA)
REG - 88 Wiley & NINJA

 

[M123]

To clarify my post earlier – if you combined Becker for reg with Ninja MCQ and notes, that is.

AUD - 77
BEC - 81
FAR - 77
REG - 81

REG - 1. Becker only - fail (forgot to study depr - oops); 2. Becker only - Pass
FAR - 1. Becker only - fail; 2. added Ninja Notes and MCQ - Pass
AUD - 1. Becker videos; Ninja Notes, Audio, MCQ, Becker Notes - Pass
BEC - 1. Ninja Notes, Audio, MCQ, Becker Notes - Pass

[Jj]

Thanks everyone. I will probably just stick with Becker and ninja mcq. Not looking forward to the new format.

[HT415]

I just took REG today, those sims are absolutely killer. Primarily because there is just so much information they throw at you…

Based on what I've read in the forums,

it seems to be the case that the (New 2017) REG exam MCQ's are very similar to the ninja MCQ (Which I can attest to, they were VERY similar)

and the Sims are similar to the Gleim software, which I've personally never used so I can't speak on, but a bunch of other people in these forums have stated that was the case for them.

AUD - 77
BEC - 77
FAR - 75
REG - 82

Licensed CPA practicing in California.

This journey is a test of will.

The feeling you get when you see that last score, is like no other.

[Jj]

@henok thanks, I'll definitely be adding ninja mcq. I took far under the new format. I hear you on those killer sims.

[mtaylo24]

Ninja MCQ and Gleim tax sims

CPA (2017)

REG:  75

BEC:  76

FAR:  77

AUD: 78

 

CMA (2019)

P1: 380

P2: 360

AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)

[Jj]

@mtaylo do you think I should just buy gliem

[.]

CPAExcel didn't really have enough examples for the tax part of REG. Good explanations but not enough examples.

FAR- 88- 6/16- (Ninja Avg. 74%)
REG- 89- 7/16- (Ninja Avg. 77%)
AUD- 95- 8/16- (Ninja Avg. 81%)
BEC- 82- 9/16- (Ninja Avg. 75%)
[Wiley CPAExcel + Ninja MCQ]

Finally licensed.

FAR - June 2016 - 88
REG - July 2016 - 89
AUD - Aug 2016 - review phase currently
BEC - Sep 2016 -

Wiley CPA Excel & Ninja MCQ

[Author]

Replies