[slugger73]

Has anybody taken REG yet in Q2 that used Becker? My exam is on Thursday and I do not feel prepared with Becker materials. The MCQs seem too easy compared to other sections. I am interested if anybody took the new exam and felt that Becker prepared them well or not.

Don't worry; be happy.

AUD- 75
BEC- 87
FAR - 96
REG- 90

[Anonymous]

Let's bump this and find some people who have taken the exam

[rsg149]

I am feeling similar

AUD - 80

FAR - 68, 78

BEC - 69, 72, 87

REG - 77

[CPyAyy]

I only used Becker for REG. I'd say 5-6 MCQs were not in the review materials at all. One simulation was not covered at all in Becker.

REG: Q3 '17

FAR: Q4 '17

AUD: Q4 '17

BEC: Q1 '18

[Big Mike]

Prepared me pretty well. 81 in 3 weeks of studying

AUD - NINJA in Training
BEC - NINJA in Training
FAR - NINJA in Training
REG - 81

DAY MAN

[jas7889]

I used becker. There was some content on the test that I didn't see in Becker at all, but the majority was covered. The SIMS were harder on exam because I don't think Becker fully grasped the real life application aspect and their SIMS didn't align with the SIMS I got on my test. I think if you truly understand the material, you can be able to tackle the exam. With all this being said, I still managed to pass using Becker.

[jtvande]

I used Becker Roger and Ninja. Roger by far was the closest to how the SIMS actually where presented.

AUD - NINJA in Training
BEC - NINJA in Training
FAR - NINJA in Training
REG - NINJA in Training

Intelligence is the result of focus and effort.

[RockLobster]

Becker was all I used, just got my 78 today. As long as you don't neglect any section, no matter how small, you will do well. The practice tests are good preparation as well, the one I took was harder than the real thing (like with all the sections I took, which were all through Becker).

AUD - 89
BEC - 81
FAR - 80
REG - 78

Free af

Ethics - 90

[lhenley94]

I used Becker for matetial, homework, and practice tests. Basically all of my review was doing MCQ with ninja. Got a 74…… Waiting on my score report but I'm sure what got me was the simulations. Sharpen that skil!!!! But otherwise I thought this combination prepared me well….. Not sure how I could have been more ready. That one point honestly probably came down to luck of the draw on questions and how many passing scores they were willing to give out.

Side note- has anyone gotten their score report yet? I'm a Virginia candidate.

AUD - 80
BEC - 83
FAR - 79
REG - NINJA in Training

Just trying to survive

[Dwill2nd]

I used 98% Becker only for Reg and passed with a 86. There were a few multiple choice where I don't remember the material specifically being in Becker, however the general concepts were and I was confident on those answers.

The sims were tricky.. I felt most of the material was covered in Becker but the way some question were asked I was unsure exactly which direction they were asking me to go. If the question was clear I knew I could answer 100% no issues but I was left making assumptions on the intent of their questions.

Overall it might not cover 100% of the exact questions you will see however, you will have majority of the concepts and the meat of the information covered.

AUD - 98
BEC - 84
FAR - 94
REG - 86

No more procrastinating!

AUD - 98 - 3.9.17
BEC - 84 - 6.8.16
FAR - 94 - 2.22.17
REG - 86 - 5.23.17

August 2017 - Official CPA?!!!!!

Bec, 6/8/2016 - 84!
Far, 7/12/2016
Reg,
Aud,

[Kodiak]

I used Becker and Ninja MCQ and I got an 84. I feel Becker was too simple, MCQ and Sims. I think the combo of Ninja and Becker are why I passed because I was getting high MCQ progress scores on Becker while my ninja numbers were much lower and realistic. I think I crushed the MCQ and my score was dragged down on the Sims. Truthfully I was afraid I wasn't going to pass because of the Sims. :/

Moving on to FAR, and I've already rescheduled it once so need to buckle down and study. Still using Becker + Ninja approach!

AUD - 85
BEC - 86
FAR - 83
REG - 84

Coffee is my favorite coworker.

[Author]

Replies