- This topic has 11 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
I am getting the sense that this new 2011 format is quite a bit more challenging and unforgiving than the pre-2011 format. From what I am seeing, it seems like there is not much chance of passing unless all simulations are fairly complete and correct, in addition to doing the MC well. Whereas previously, I read a lot of stories of folks who may have done average to above average on the MC and still left a great deal blank on the SIMS, and still passed.
Why do you think this is? Is this true, or is this just a feeling we all have? Is it a folie a deux? If true, why is the AICPA starting to take a tougher stance all of a sudden? Perhaps the CPA designation was being viewed as cheapened because so many were passing. Hey, times are tough, people are trying to gain a competitive edge with good designations. I am still waiting for AUD results, my last part. I am much more nervous after reading many of these truthful posts, having passed other sections in 2010. I felt I did well on the MC, but had some struggles and eye-brow raising on some of the SIMS. Maybe good enough to pass in 2010, but not this year.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.