- This topic has 1,389 replies, 183 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by nicole2035.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 14, 2014 at 3:33 pm #185550jeffKeymaster
Free Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
AUD - 79
BEC - 80
FAR - 76
REG - 92
-
AuthorReplies
-
June 11, 2014 at 7:10 pm #592294NYCaccountantParticipant
I'm not sure if I'm remembering the answer, or the concept lol. I choose only new questions in Ninja, but most of the questions feel like I've seen them before. It's weird. Or maybe there are limited amount of ways they can ask a question?
Maybe @gabequinn can provide some clarity on this?
AUD - 99
BEC - 84
FAR - 93
REG - 87NYC born and raised.FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.June 11, 2014 at 7:22 pm #592295GabeParticipantI can't give specifics (obviously) but. like I said, I wasn't surprised by any of the questions. As it was mentioned above, there's only so many ways they can ask a question. If you're doing well in the WTB or ninja, I wouldn't worry about it. The thing that got me were the SIMS, the MCQ were standard.
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016June 11, 2014 at 7:23 pm #592296ziebaParticipantWhile you are correct, in that there's only so many ways one can test a concept, my test was chock full of unique (and poorly written!) questions. I had to read it once and then twice to get at what they were saying, and only then start to eliminate answer choices. Certain concepts which were tested in the strangest of ways; wordy and backwards. If you wanted to ask me THAT why didn't you just ask it the way I've seen in it while preparing?! I'd say to myself, at that point, having seem 99,999 prep MCQ's and however many testlets I ate through sitting there.
BEC is the only exam where I felt like the questions were straight out of “the book”, especially on cost and variances.
That said, if you know you core concepts, you should be okay to handle their ways of asking essentially the same thing . A good summary of core concepts are the final review notes, which are distilled to cover the must knows. I feel like with the other math or J/E intensive test you have some framework to fall back on, or the answer is always formula + plug = answer. Here you really have to rely on the fact that you understand a concept well enough to be able to pick it out of “a lineup”.
AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
BEC - 74 , 77
REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
FAR - 69 , 75Dr: perseverance
Dr: intelligence
Dr: luck
. Cr: . advisory scoreJune 11, 2014 at 10:26 pm #592297iddyrashyMemberJune 12, 2014 at 2:01 am #592298GabeParticipantSaw this come up in my review: what is the difference between the audit committee and executive management? For instance, who would you report fraud to? I assume, low level fraud- audit committee because executive mnmgt could be in on it….
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016June 12, 2014 at 2:34 am #592299NYCaccountantParticipantReport all management fraud to the audit committee. Report all material fraud to audit committee as well. The executive management are the officers (CEO, CFO) etc who run the daily operations. The audit committee is one of the three committees of the board of directors. They are responsible for hiring the auditor, agreeing to the scope, and audit fee.
AUD - 99
BEC - 84
FAR - 93
REG - 87NYC born and raised.FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.June 12, 2014 at 2:32 pm #592300ruggercpa2bParticipantI am having a hard time grasping the Audit Evidence – Specific Audit Areas which has inventory, cash, a/r etc. Other than just working through questions does anyone have suggestions on how to master it? I find that even though I am working the questions I still get them wrong because I don't have a good grasp of the material.
AUD - 1/6/18
FAR - TBD
REG - TBD
BEC - TBDAUD - 73, 72 retake 7/2/2016
BEC - 8/20/2016
REG - TBD
FAR - TBDI am so ready for this nightmare to be over. Been at this way too long.
June 12, 2014 at 3:21 pm #592301ShmeePAParticipantJune 12, 2014 at 3:27 pm #592302GabeParticipantI'm a visual person, so I find drawing it out helps a lot.
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016June 12, 2014 at 3:38 pm #592303NYCaccountantParticipantFor transaction cycles, you need to understand vouching and tracing. I did not memorize them, I just use common sense and my understanding of directional testing and 9/10 I'm right.
AUD - 99
BEC - 84
FAR - 93
REG - 87NYC born and raised.FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.June 12, 2014 at 3:41 pm #592304lsutigers03ParticipantI'm curious how everyone is studying for Audit Risk. Specifically if you're given a situation and asked if it increases or decreases inherent, control, or detection risk or if it has no effect. I know that not knowing how to answer those questions was my downfall last month so some pointers would be great.
REG - 78
BEC - 74, 67, 69, 69, 70, 79
FAR - 76
AUD - 69, 69, 69, 74, 85Licensed Louisiana CPA
āYou never fail until you stop trying.ā
ā Albert EinsteinJune 12, 2014 at 3:50 pm #592305NYCaccountantParticipantIf inherent, or control risk increase – Acceptable detection risk must decrease, more testing must be done.
If inherent, or control risk decrease – Acceptable detection risk can increase because the controls are more effective, hence they will be more able to detect and prevent misstatements. Less substantive testing would be done in this situation.
They have an inverse relationship to one another. Detection risk is the only element the Auditor can control, and Inherent and control risk are independent of the actual audit.
I was confused on this too, until I started putting the word acceptable before detection risk.
AUD - 99
BEC - 84
FAR - 93
REG - 87NYC born and raised.FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.June 12, 2014 at 4:10 pm #592306lsutigers03Participant@NYCaccountant – One thing I second guessed myself on was if inherent or control risk change does detection risk always have to change inversely?. The example below is what I really have trouble with. I don't know how to take these questions and determine what effect it has on audit risk.
Bestwood Furniture, Inc., a nonissuer that produces wood furniture, is undergoing a year 2 audit. The situations in the table below describe changes Bestwood made during year 2 that may or may not contribute to audit risk. For each situation, double-click in the associated shaded cell and select from the list provided the impact, if any, that the situation has on a specific component of audit risk for the year 2 audit. A selection may be used once, more than once, or not at all.
During year 2, the company instituted a new procedure whereby the internal audit department distributes payroll checks to employees for selected payroll cycles.
In year 2, the auditor noted that the company's newly hired purchasing agent was not obtaining competitive bids for all major purchase requisitions.
Early in year 2, the company extended its existing warranty program on some of its major products in an effort to increase revenue.
The answers are decreases control risk, increases control risk, and increases inherent risk.
These are relatively easy compared to what I've seen on the exam but these are the types of questions that give me issues.
REG - 78
BEC - 74, 67, 69, 69, 70, 79
FAR - 76
AUD - 69, 69, 69, 74, 85Licensed Louisiana CPA
āYou never fail until you stop trying.ā
ā Albert EinsteinJune 12, 2014 at 4:14 pm #592307iddyrashyMemberI think Audit Sampling is my weakest area, I am okay with attribute sample. I understand the relationship between sample size, deviation rate, tolerable rate and access control risk too low. However, sometime I failed to reflect the concept toward the whole population and not a sample size. For instance if you access control risk too low the sample size and deviation rate increase, what happened to population deviation rate?
I will spend this weekend to get variable sampling going, I have know clue on how to do some calculation on PPS which i have a fear they can be part of Sims.
AUD 89 (07/06/14)
REG 83 (08/27/2015)
FAR 78 (04/27/2015)
BEC 75 (11/13/2015)TEXAS 2016
June 12, 2014 at 4:24 pm #592308iddyrashyMember@lsutigers03 to my opinion this you will need to understand testing of control to answer it correct. For instance at year 2 the checks of payroll are not distributed by payroll personnel instead someone from internal audit does it, that is good segregation of duty hence the internal control is working well and that results reduction of control risk.
Year 2 the company hire purchasing agent who is not obtaining competitive bid, you know a good control in purchasing to pay cycle is approved requisition sent to Purchasing, the purchasing people get three bids from different vendors, establish the terms with vendors, then issue a PO to the best bidder. If the new guy is not sourcing for three bid, then control is undermined and that increase the risk.
The last one you will see management convoluted the control in order to increase the revenue, and this increase inherent risk.
I hope it make sense.
AUD 89 (07/06/14)
REG 83 (08/27/2015)
FAR 78 (04/27/2015)
BEC 75 (11/13/2015)TEXAS 2016
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.