Cash to Accrual….again

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #190419
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi there,

    I have been starring at FAR for 2 days straight and can’t seem to think straight any more. Could anyone please explain to me why the J/E approach fails to yield the desired results (or what am I doing wrong) for the question below…


    Co’s modified cash-basis financial statements indicate cash paid for operating expenses of $150,000, end-of-year prepaid expenses of $15,000, and accrued liabilities of $25,000. At the beginning of the year, Young & Jamison had prepaid expenses of $10,000, while accrued liabilities were $5,000. If cash paid for operating expenses is converted to accrual-basis operating expenses, what would be the amount of operating expenses?

    Answer is $165,000.


    I’m trying to plug it into J/E but failing miserably as I see 135 as result:

    Dr Op Expense 150

    Dr Prepaid Exp 5

    Cr Accrued Liab 20

    Cr Income 135

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #620798
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You need to not approach these questions with journal entries.

    Instead, remember that when converting from cash to accrual, you move in the opposite direction of the asset accounts ($10,000 to $15,000) and you move in the same direction of the liability accounts ($5,000 – $25,000).

    Netting, you get a decrease of $5,000 and an increase of $20,000 resulting in $15,000 or $165,000.

    #621798
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You need to not approach these questions with journal entries.

    Instead, remember that when converting from cash to accrual, you move in the opposite direction of the asset accounts ($10,000 to $15,000) and you move in the same direction of the liability accounts ($5,000 – $25,000).

    Netting, you get a decrease of $5,000 and an increase of $20,000 resulting in $15,000 or $165,000.

    #620799
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    .

    #621799
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    .

    #620800
    ocboa
    Member

    appreciate the explanation

    #621800
    ocboa
    Member

    appreciate the explanation

    #620801
    saucesah
    Member

    Wiley has a good reference table that helped… i'll try demonstrate it below.

    It takes Net Income to Cash Basis

    Asset | Liability

    Increase – | +

    Decrease + | –

    If you have an asset that increased, then you remove (-) it from NI, if it decreased then you would add it back.

    If you have an liability that increased, you would add it back… and vice versa.

    To go from Cash to Accrual, you would just swap the signs in the table to the opposite.

    I basically just remembered this table… however, when I would do MCQs I would still ensure that the logic made sense, this just helped me piece it together.

    Today, I became a cool kid.

    AUD - Passed
    REG - Passed
    BEC - Passed
    FAR - Passed

    #621801
    saucesah
    Member

    Wiley has a good reference table that helped… i'll try demonstrate it below.

    It takes Net Income to Cash Basis

    Asset | Liability

    Increase – | +

    Decrease + | –

    If you have an asset that increased, then you remove (-) it from NI, if it decreased then you would add it back.

    If you have an liability that increased, you would add it back… and vice versa.

    To go from Cash to Accrual, you would just swap the signs in the table to the opposite.

    I basically just remembered this table… however, when I would do MCQs I would still ensure that the logic made sense, this just helped me piece it together.

    Today, I became a cool kid.

    AUD - Passed
    REG - Passed
    BEC - Passed
    FAR - Passed

    #620802
    ocboa
    Member

    and an easy way to understand the logic is if an asset like a/rec decreases, you could assume you collected cash. So when asset decreases you add to net income.

    If a liability like accts payable decreases, you could assume you paid cash. So when a liability decreases, you subtract from net income.

    #621802
    ocboa
    Member

    and an easy way to understand the logic is if an asset like a/rec decreases, you could assume you collected cash. So when asset decreases you add to net income.

    If a liability like accts payable decreases, you could assume you paid cash. So when a liability decreases, you subtract from net income.

    #620803
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks guys, much appreciated.

    #621803
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks guys, much appreciated.

    #620804
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don't think there is anything wrong with breaking this down in journal entry format. You are just doing that incorrectly.

    The correct entry would be as follows:

    DR. Operating Expense (Plug) – This would be 165

    DR. Prepaid Expense 5

    CR. Accrued Liab. 20

    CR. Cash Paid for Op Exp 150

    You just need to make sure to double check whether you are converting from accrual to cash or vice versa. This particular problem states “Cash paid for operating expense” rather than operating expense in the traditional accrual format. Your solution assumes your plug is “income”, but that would only be the case if you were converting from accrual to cash.

    Hope this helps provide some clarification. Best of luck!

    #621804
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don't think there is anything wrong with breaking this down in journal entry format. You are just doing that incorrectly.

    The correct entry would be as follows:

    DR. Operating Expense (Plug) – This would be 165

    DR. Prepaid Expense 5

    CR. Accrued Liab. 20

    CR. Cash Paid for Op Exp 150

    You just need to make sure to double check whether you are converting from accrual to cash or vice versa. This particular problem states “Cash paid for operating expense” rather than operating expense in the traditional accrual format. Your solution assumes your plug is “income”, but that would only be the case if you were converting from accrual to cash.

    Hope this helps provide some clarification. Best of luck!

    #620805
    shinallsm
    Member

    Honestly, I've set mine up as kind of a mnemonic, but it a strange way. I don't know if you have played old school mortal combat when you have to do up downs up down and a b x , etc etc you get the point anyways. Here it is, it's worked for everything I've done so far.

    Liability â–² —

    Liability â–¼ +

    Asset â–² +

    Asset â–¼ —

    So for instance if they are on cash and going to accrual, if the liability â–² (increases) then I subtract that for the accrual method. If the Asset â–² (increases) then I add that for the accrual method.

    Essentially, I just remember Liability x2, Assets x2 then up down for both, then i create the out side box with — and the inside options are +.

    Not sure if that helps, but its the way my brain works.

    REG - 90 - 10/31/14
    FAR - 77 - 1/3/15
    AUD - 89 - 4/1/15
    BEC - ?? - 5/27/15

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.