[D]

Below is my performance assessment for BEC.

Q1 (72) / Q2 (72)

Corporate Governance (16-20%) : Comparable / Stronger

Economics (16-20%) : Weaker / Weaker

Fin Mgmt (19-23%) : Weaker / Weaker

Info Systems (15-19%) : Comparable / Stronger

Strategic Planning (10-14%) : Weaker / Weaker

Ops Mgmt (12-16%) : Comparable / Comparable

Written Communication: Comparable / Stronger

MCQ (If its not obvious): Weaker / Weaker

In summary, FOCUS ON YOUR WEAK AREAS! (—>insert Homer Simpson..”Doh!”<—)

I didn’t neglect them, but I feel like I shouldn’t have even wasted time in the other areas I did ok on last time.. because now I’m stronger in those, still weak in the others. I was stressed trying to juggle and make sure I didn’t lose touch on the areas I already had down, that I obviously didn’t get the grasp I needed in weak areas.

**************************
AUD: 77  (Jan 2016)
BEC: 80  (May 2016)
REG: (rematch May 2017)
FAR: (rematch Apr 2017)
**************************

----------
AUD - 74, 77! (1/2016)
BEC - 80! (5/2016)
REG - tbd (8/2016)
FAR - tbd

Study materials: NINJA MCQ/Audio/Notes

"I can do ALL things through Christ who strengthens me!"
----------

[kplummer517]

I'm sorry. 🙁 That just doesn't seem like a 72 score. I wish we could see our actual tests failed so we can see what we are actually missing. So frustrating. I would focus on your weak areas first and then just review the others. You'll get it!

AUD - Passed - 82 (10/1/13), Expires 4/1/2015 (57,62,64)
BEC - Passed - 77 (7/14/14) (53,67,70,74) Half way to CPA!!!!
REG - Passed - 81 (8/23/14) (68) 3 down 1 to go!!
FAR - Passed - 75 (11/11/14) I'm DONE!!!!!

Illinois Canidate

[Anonymous]

That is a bummer. I presume that you did worse on the “Weaker” sections than you did in Q1 (maybe in Q1, you were just barely “Weaker”), so it offset your explicit improvements. But still, you'd almost wish it would have said “Even Weaker”, because then you'd at least have an explanation. As is, it is a pretty inexplicable.

[Author]

Replies