Opinion on entity's internal control over financial reporting

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #171047
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In a PCAOB audit, is the auditor supposed to express an opinion on effectiveness internal control over financial reporting? Should the auditor also include effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in written communication to the client?

    I was working on becker’s sims AICPA released 2009, tab 1 and it is saying that auditors communication to client should include a statement that auditor does not express an opinion on effectiveness internal control over financial reporting

Viewing 11 replies - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #391626
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    PCAOB audits do not require an opinion on internal control unless the engagement is an integrated audit.

    #391627
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So strange, I've read it in Roger's Aud notes that in PCAOB audit the auditor must report / express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control! It never mentioned that this is subject to the engagement stating this explicitly!

    Please help !! What's right?? 🙁

    #391628
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Even I am studying from Roger and felt the same thing. Does the public company not need to test controls and issue a report on internal controls?

    #391629
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    PCAOB Auditing Standards 5

    Introduction

    1. This standard establishes requirements and provides direction that applies when an auditor is engaged to perform an audit of management's assessment 1/ of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (“the audit of internal control over financial reporting”) that is integrated with an audit of the financial statements. 2/

    2. Effective internal control over financial reporting provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes. 3/ If one or more material weaknesses exist, the company's internal control over financial reporting cannot be considered effective. 4/

    [The following paragraph is effective for audits of fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010. See PCAOB Release No. 2010-004. For audits of fiscal years beginning before December 15, 2010, click here.]

    3. The auditor's objective in an audit of internal control over financial reporting is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting. Because a company's internal control cannot be considered effective if one or more material weaknesses exist, to form a basis for expressing an opinion, the auditor must plan and perform the audit to obtain appropriate evidence that is sufficient to obtain reasonable assurance 5/ about whether material weaknesses exist as of the date specified in management's assessment. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting may exist even when financial statements are not materially misstated.

    4. The general standards 6/ are applicable to an audit of internal control over financial reporting. Those standards require technical training and proficiency as an auditor, independence, and the exercise of due professional care, including professional skepticism. This standard establishes the fieldwork and reporting standards applicable to an audit of internal control over financial reporting.

    5. The auditor should use the same suitable, recognized control framework to perform his or her audit of internal control over financial reporting as management uses for its annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting. 7/

    Integrating the Audits

    6. The audit of internal control over financial reporting should be integrated with the audit of the financial statements. The objectives of the audits are not identical, however, and the auditor must plan and perform the work to achieve the objectives of both audits.

    7. In an integrated audit of internal control over financial reporting and the financial statements, the auditor should design his or her testing of controls to accomplish the objectives of both audits simultaneously –

    To obtain sufficient evidence to support the auditor's opinion on internal control over financial reporting as of year-end, and

    To obtain sufficient evidence to support the auditor's control risk assessments for purposes of the audit of financial statements.

    8. Obtaining sufficient evidence to support control risk assessments of low for purposes of the financial statement audit ordinarily allows the auditor to reduce the amount of audit work that otherwise would have been necessary to opine on the financial statements. (See Appendix B for additional direction on integration.)

    Note: In some circumstances, particularly in some audits of smaller and less complex companies, the auditor might choose not to assess control risk as low for purposes of the audit of the financial statements. In such circumstances, the auditor's tests of the operating effectiveness of controls would be performed principally for the purpose of supporting his or her opinion on whether the company's internal control over financial reporting is effective as of year-end. The results of the auditor's financial statement auditing procedures also should inform his or her risk assessments in determining the testing necessary to conclude on the effectiveness of a control.

    #391630
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I misspoke in my first post: all public companies require an integrated audit!

    #391631
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In that case why does becker's sims AICPA released 2009, tab 1 and it is saying that auditors communication to client should include a statement that auditor does not express an opinion on effectiveness internal control over financial reporting. Is this a becker error?

    #391632
    Maged Melio
    Member

    Audit for Issuer companies – Public companies -, Integrated audit (inculding internal control ) is required by PCAOB.

    Audit for the nonissuer – private companies – regarding GAAS; internal control audit is not required.

    That's according to the study from Becker material 2012.

    “If you are not willing to risk the unusual, you will have to settle for the ordinary.”

    #391633
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Do you have the AICPA released 2009, tab 1 question in beckers 2012 sims. Did any one else work on this simulation. Please advise. I am confused and I am taking the exam after 5 days. Thanks

    #391634
    moey
    Member

    Sorry to bring back an old thread, but I'm confused too! I'm doing A5 Sims #3 (2013 version) and the first question relates to the purpose of the audit.. So can someone help?

    The purpose of the audit is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control over financial reporting for:

    PCAOB Integrated Audits – Yes?

    Nonissuers Audit – No

    Nonissuers Examination on Internal Controls – Yes

    FAR - 90
    REG - 75
    AUD
    BEC

    #391635
    Mjs157
    Member

    There's a difference between auditing IC and Auditing IC/FR. So yeah Moey, it seems pretty spot on.

    #391636

    Yea, basically in a Non-issuer's financial statement audit, you'd look at the internal controls to assess your CR in the audit but you do NOT need to give an opinion on the internal controls. If they hired you specifically to give an opinion on internal controls, then you would write an opinion. But generally a financial statement audit does not include an opinion on IC.

    Issuers (public companies) ALWAYS have to have an opinion on their internal controls.

    B-85 OCT 2012
    A-84 NOV 2012
    R-90 JAN 2013
    F-89 AUG 2012
    Ethics-92 (3rd try)

    I am DONE BABY!!!
    Used Roger 2012 + Wiley + NINJA Notes

Viewing 11 replies - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.