- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hi,
I’m writing regarding to the AUD material from Becker’s Review, Chapter 2, Module 6 (Materiality). There is a question (Q CPA-04685) that provides an answer, but it gets me confused the response. I believe the response is other than the answer selected (per the explanation). Provides a correct answer for $98k but below shows the calculation of the answer for $70k.
Please can someone advise if this was an error in the selection of the answer or I am not understanding the explanation. I would appreciate any response regarding this matter.
Thank you,
Question CPA-04685:
Tracy, senior accountant at JFM CPA Firm, is determining the performance materiality for her client in Year 2. Tracy expects that there will be a high likelihood of uncorrected and undetected misstatements.
JFM CPA Firm’s materiality guidelines advise the auditor to set performance materiality in the range of 50% to 70% of overall materiality based on the likelihood of misstatement. Tracy has calculated overall materiality at $140k.
Tracy will most likely set performance materiality closes to:
Correct answer: A) $98,000
Choice “A” is correct.
$140k (overall materiality) X 50% (lower range provided in audit firm guidance) = $70,000. Tracy believes that there is a high likelihood of uncorrected and undetected misstatements. Therefore, Tracy most likely will use a percentage closer to the lower end of the range provided in firm guidance. Generally, if there is a high likelihood of misstatements then auditor sets materiality at a lower amount, which results in the auditor looking closer at audit evidence.
FAR: 76
BEC: 77
AUD: 77
REG: 85
"Failure will never overtake me if my determination to succeed is strong enough." Og Mandino"Des-pa-cito" -Luis Fonsi
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.