Confusing question on consolidated NI—Gleim textbook adds NI of parent and sub

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1530258
    nalratoss
    Participant

    Fact Pattern: The separate condensed balance sheets and income statements of Pater Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Subito Corp., are as follows:
    BALANCE SHEETS
    As of December 31
    Pater
    Subito
    Assets
    Current assets
    Cash
    $ 80,000
    $ 60,000
    Accounts receivable (net)
    140,000
    25,000
    Inventories
    90,000
    50,000
    Total current assets
    $ 310,000
    $135,000
    Property, plant, and
    equipment (net)
    515,000
    280,000
    Intangible assets
    100,000

    Investment in Subito
    (equity method)
    400,000

    Total assets
    $1,325,000
    $415,000
    Liabilities and Equity
    Current liabilities
    Accounts payable
    $ 160,000
    $ 95,000
    Accrued liabilities
    110,000
    30,000
    Total current liabilities
    $ 270,000
    $125,000
    Equity
    Common stock ($10 par)
    $ 300,000
    $ 50,000
    Additional paid-in capital
    10,000
    Retained earnings
    755,000
    230,000
    Total equity
    $1,055,000
    $290,000
    Total liabilities and equity
    $1,325,000
    $415,000

    INCOME STATEMENTS
    For the Year Ended December 31
    Pater
    Subito
    Sales
    $2,000,000
    $750,000
    Cost of goods sold
    1,540,000
    500,000
    Gross margin
    $ 460,000
    $250,000
    Operating expenses
    260,000
    150,000
    Operating income
    $ 200,000
    $100,000
    Equity in earnings of Subito
    70,000

    Income before income taxes
    $ 270,000
    $100,000
    Provision for income taxes
    70,000
    30,000
    Net income
    $ 200,000
    $ 70,000
    Additional Information:
    On January 1, Pater purchased for $360,000 all of Subito’s $10 par, voting common stock. On January 1, the fair value of Subito’s assets and liabilities equaled their carrying amounts of $410,000 and $160,000, respectively. Pater amortizes intangible assets over a 10-year period.
    During the year, Pater and Subito paid cash dividends of $100,000 and $30,000, respectively. For tax purposes, Pater receives the 100% exclusion for dividends received from Subito.
    There were no intraentity transactions, except for Pater’s receipt of dividends from Subito and Pater’s recording of its share of Subito’s earnings.
    No transactions affected other comprehensive income.
    Both Pater and Subito paid income taxes at the rate of 30%.
    Pater treats Subito as a reporting unit, and all goodwill acquired in the business combination is assigned to Subito for the purpose of testing impairment. However, goodwill was not impaired on December 31.
    Assume that no eliminations or adjustments in the consolidation procedure affect the amount of Pater’s or Subito’s net income included in consolidated net income.

    In the December 31 consolidated financial statements of Pater and its subsidiary, net income should be
    Correct Submit $200,000
    This answer is correct.
    Because Pater owns 100% of Subito, all of Subito’s net income for the period since acquisition is included in Pater’s separate net income. Also, given that no eliminations or adjustments affect the separate net income of Pater and Subito, consolidated net income for the year is $200,000.
    Graded Submit $270,000
    Submit $170,000
    Submit $190,000

    I don’t understand, in the textbook, they added the NI of parent and sub together. Yet in here, when they asked about the net income in consolidated financial statements, the NI of sub is not added.

    I hate it when they publish material that is confusing.

    FAR-80

    AUD-77

    REG-75

    BEC-82

     

    I'm done done!

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1530277
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In the textbook example, how much of the sub was owned?

    #1530288
    nalratoss
    Participant

    @Almond
    In the book, the parent owns 80% of sub.

    I guess the trick here is, in the book's example, before showing the income of Parent and Sub, it says “the following are the separate statements of income of the two companies, excluding P's share of income from S”

    “excluding P's share of income from S”

    Is that the trick here?

    So basically, in the question shown above, all the income shown for the Sub are Parent's share?

    FAR-80

    AUD-77

    REG-75

    BEC-82

     

    I'm done done!

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.