FAR MCQ question

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1434849
    Char143
    Participant

    Town, Inc., is preparing its financial statements for the year ending December 31, 20X1. On December 1, 20X1, Town was awarded damages of $75,000 in a patent infringement suit it brought against a competitor. The defendant did not appeal the verdict, and payment was received in January 20X2, prior to the issuance of the financial statements. What is the reporting requirement?

    A.Disclosure only

    B.Accrual only

    C.Both accrual and disclosure

    D.Neither accrual nor disclosure

    The answer is C, which I get, but if the question stated “the defendant is appealing the verdict” would we still accrue it (disclose only)? I feel like no accrual if fighting the verdict, but I want to make sure.

    AUD - 84
    BEC - 79
    FAR - 78
    REG - 79
    I'm done! 🙏🏼

     

    Licensed CPA

    AUD (2/16)-84
    REG (05/16)-69 Retake (7/16)-79 (ty ninja MCQ)
    BEC-TBD
    FAR-9/8/16

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1435116
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No, accrual only disclosure. Gain contingencies are recognized when a legal requirement for payment by the plaintiff has been met, the plaintiff has agreed to the settlement and payment is reasonably assured.

    #1435121
    Scared-cpa
    Participant

    You're right, if the verdict was appealed, it would be disclosed but NOT accrued. Gain contingencies are only accrued when they are legally enforceable, pretty much 100% assured.

    "The more I practice, the luckier I get."

    FAR - 67, 82 (Expires 07/31/18)
    AUD - 68, 79
    REG - 75
    BEC - 82

    Wiley CPAexcel + Ninja

    I cannot believe I am done.

    #1435127
    Mike J
    Participant

    But wouldn't whether to accrue and/or just disclose depend on an assessment by legal counsel, specific to the appeal?

    After all, an original law suit is considered “probable” or “reasonably possible” to be a loser by an attorney not our own feeling as a CPA.

    AUD - 90
    BEC - 79
    FAR - 77
    REG - 77
    They don't trust JUST ANYBODY to count beans
    #1435158
    Scared-cpa
    Participant

    Mike, in most situations it seems to be legal counsel's decision on how probable a contingency is that we base the accrual or disclosure upon. However, whether the gain contingency is probably or not, it doesn't matter. A gain contingency is not recognized until certain that it will be received. So not probable or reasonably assured, but guaranteed. This is my take on it.

    "The more I practice, the luckier I get."

    FAR - 67, 82 (Expires 07/31/18)
    AUD - 68, 79
    REG - 75
    BEC - 82

    Wiley CPAexcel + Ninja

    I cannot believe I am done.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.