- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 3 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hi everyone, below is a question that I found word for word the same in both Becker and Ninja. Both of them give different answers. Can someone please view the below and let me know which answer is right? Becker says that the “Provision for bad debts” should not be subtracted.
Hospital, Inc., a not-for-profit organization with no governmental affiliation, reported the following in its accounts for the current year ended December 31:
Gross Patient service revenue (note this figure includes charity care of $25,000) : $775,000
Provision for bad debts: $ 15,000
Difference b/t established billing rates and fees negotiated with 3rd party payers: $ 70,000Becker Solution: 775,000-25,000-70,000 = $680,000 of net patient service revenue
Ninja Solution: 775,000-25,000-15,000-70,000 = $665,000 of net patient service revenue.As you can see, the difference is that ninja is saying that the provision for bad debts should be subtracted. The Becker solution specifically states that “bad debt expense is recognized as an expense, not a contract revenue, and should not be subtracted.
@Jeff, can you please weigh in on this? It would be greatly appreciated. I want to make sure that I understand what the correct answer is and why.
AUD - 83
BEC - 82
FAR - 80
REG - 83“There is only one thing that makes a dream impossible to achieve: the fear of failure.”― Paulo Coelho,
Ethics - 96
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.