REG – Missing out on deadly details?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1782083
    itooshallpass
    Participant

    So I’m 4 chapters in to Roger’s REG course. I haven’t done a whole lot of MCQs, but I have been watching videos, reading each chapter and taking notes, followed by a short practice session. What I’ve noticed so far is that there are a good deal of smaller details coming up in questions that were not even covered in the lectures or book. For example, there was a question on the 2% ownership criteria for S corp health insurance benefits. I went back and looked at that section in the book thinking I must have skimmed over it, but there is nothing there on that topic.

    Obviously I wouldn’t expect the course to include every dot and tittle in the tax code, but there seems to be a ton of small-but-deadly stuff on every topic… and I feel like there are some holes here. I’m kind of relying on my review course for the majority of my preparation… so, how should I be filling in the gaps? Maybe just the explanation on the question? Anyone else dealing with this? I’m kinda frustrated…

    FAR - 85 (12/17)
    AUD - 80 (1/18)
    REG - 83 (6/18)
    BEC - 85 (7/18)

    Ethics - 95

    DONE DONE DONE DONE

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1782086
    noor
    Participant

    I took reg last quarter and used only roger to prepare – I think the course does a really good job with reg but i did go through all multiple questions atleast twice. I wouldn't worry about the crazy small details

    AUD - 77
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 88
    REG - 81
    ---
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.